2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anodic stripping voltammetry with gold electrodes as an alternative method for the routine determination of mercury in fish. Comparison with spectroscopic approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low standard deviation values indicate high precision of the analytical method used. Slightly lower values of concentrations were obtained by other authors of miscellaneous studies conducted in their respective countries, both Europe and other parts of the world (Giacomino et al 2017 ; Kwaansa-Ansah et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Low standard deviation values indicate high precision of the analytical method used. Slightly lower values of concentrations were obtained by other authors of miscellaneous studies conducted in their respective countries, both Europe and other parts of the world (Giacomino et al 2017 ; Kwaansa-Ansah et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Other methods are often used to analyse mercury from aqueous solutions, including, inter alia, the extraction and colorimetric method, flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry combined with the cold vapour method (CV-AAS) and the indirect dithizone method with copper carbamate. The methods of mercury determination have been compared a number of times (Giacomino et al 2017 ; Kwaansa-Ansah et al 2016 ; Xia et al 2010 ; Domanico et al 2017 ). In this study, however, the analysis was limited to isotachophoresis following the previously developed methodology (Kluska et al 2014 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A carbon nanotubes‐based sensor also used to detect the HMIs selectively but at micromolar range [7, 8] and single‐walled boron nitride nanotube and triple‐walled boron nitride nanotube‐based biosensor simulation approach capable of detecting zeptogram of mass [9, 10] but need to check the sensitivity and complexity of the fabricated device. Many authors used Au/Ag nanoparticles (NPs) for the selective detection of mercury and other biomolecules, but measurements mainly taken in the laboratory‐based analytical instruments and on‐site detection is not possible [11–27]. The mesoporous silica‐based optical selective detection and removal of Hg 2+ ions using nanocomposite material by Shahat et al [28] is a highly pH‐dependent approach, and lower concentration in the nanomolar range is not possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, different types of electrodes were proposed, starting from hanging mercury drop electrode HMDE which might be described by excellent performance but is less common nowadays due to mercury toxicity and its impact on environment. In the meanwhile, new generation of eco‐friendly electrodes have been developed, like for example platinum or gold electrodes, modified glassy carbon electrodes and finally film electrodes (covered with mercury, bismuth, lead, gallium) . The electrode which belongs to the last group is cyclic renewable mercury (amalgam) film electrode Hg(Ag)FE applied in this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%