2012
DOI: 10.4236/ijg.2012.324086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalies Observed in VLF and LF Radio Signals on the Occasion of the Western Turkey Earthquake (M<sub>w</sub> = 5.7) on May 19, 2011

Abstract: Since 2009 a network of VLF (20 -60 kHz) and LF (150 -300 kHz) radio receivers is operating in Europe in order to study the disturbances produced by the earthquakes on the propagation of these signals. In 2011 the network was formed by nine receivers, of which three are located in Italy and one is in

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, the anomaly investigated refers to the value of the crustal heights measured by means of GPS techniques. In accordance with other types of anomalies, such as radio [3, 5,13,14] or chemical anomalies, the presesimic effects are mainly located around the epicentral area. We can conclude that GPS techniques can be of ex-treme importance in the task of earthquake prediction, and together with other type of anomalies related to seismic activity, we can have the basis for a multi-parametric approach in earthquake prediction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In this paper, the anomaly investigated refers to the value of the crustal heights measured by means of GPS techniques. In accordance with other types of anomalies, such as radio [3, 5,13,14] or chemical anomalies, the presesimic effects are mainly located around the epicentral area. We can conclude that GPS techniques can be of ex-treme importance in the task of earthquake prediction, and together with other type of anomalies related to seismic activity, we can have the basis for a multi-parametric approach in earthquake prediction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Events that are not in close proximity to the receiver, can at most produce disturbances in stations that are in the same bearing as the seismic event in question, as it has been shown in previous studies [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], concerning a variety of methods and disturbances. In the case of this particular seismic event, which took place near the receiver, a disturbance is evident across the signals of all the stations and especially the VLF stations and provides a clear pattern to pinpoint and detect the precursor phenomena of a seismic event in the area close to the receiving antenna.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Agreat amount of research in the last twenty years by means of ground-based experiments [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], spaceborn studies [18], [19], [20] and combined space-born and ground-based studies [21], [22] as well, indicate the existence of pre-, co-and post-earthquake ionospheric perturbations at all ionospheric layer levels (D, E and F layers).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evident anomalies were revealed both in the signals broadcasted by the TRT transmitter (180 kHz) located near Ankara and in a VLF signal coming from a transmitter located in western Europe and collected by the receiver TUR of the network located in eastern Turkey. Evident precursor phases were pointed out (Biagi et al 2012). ELF (Extremely Low Frequency)-VLF emissions occurred during fracturing of rocks, in laboratory experiments, and have been recorded also before earthquakes by three ELF-VLF stations installed in Central Apennines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%