Anomalies: The Winner's Curse

Abstract

Next time that you find yourself a little short of cash for lunch, try the following experiment in your class. Take a jar and fill it with coins, noting the total value of the coins. Now auction off the jar to your class (offering to pay the winning bidder in bills to control for penny aversion). Chances are very high that the following results will be obtained: (1) the average bid will be significantly less than the value of the coins (bidders are risk averse); (2) the winning bid will exceed the value of the jar. Therefore, you will have money for lunch, and your students will have learned first-hand about the “winner's curse.” The winner's curse cannot occur if all the bidders are rational, so evidence of a winner's curse in market settings would constitute an anomaly. However, acting rationally in a common value auction can be difficult. Solving for the optimal bid is not trivial. Thus, it is an empirical question whether bidders in various contexts get it right or are cursed. I will present some evidence, both from experimental and field studies, suggesting that the winner's curse may be a common phenomenon.

The Loser's Curse: Decision Making and Market Efficiency in the National Football League Draft

“…value is likely to overpay (for a review see Richard H. Thaler, 1988). 7,8 False consensus suggests that teams will overestimate the need to trade-up in order to acquire a player they value because they will believe, unduly, that other teams value him similarly (L. Ross et al, 1977).…”

Publication selection in health policy research: The winner's curse hypothesis

“…2 In economics, the 'winner's curse' is the phenomenon where the winning bidder systematically pays an inflated price, or receives a lower than expected profit, in common value auctions (Thaler, 1988). 3 Over 90% of submitted research manuscripts are rejected by the top medical and economic journals 4 Ioannidis (2005) found that nearly a third of the most highly cited medical research studies (those with more than 1,000 citations) are contradicted by or found to have stronger effects than subsequent research published within a few years.…”

Revisiting the relevance of economic theory to hotel revenue management education and practice in the era of Big Data

“…Sunstein (1999) explores the idea of preference reversals, originating from Thaler's (1992) work, that proved individuals make different decisions under different circumstances given the same data, as in a different context they view the information as different when, rationally, it should be regarded as giving an identical message. This is because different framing effects may be applied in different decision-making contexts, but to the same information.…”