2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.74.041301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous in-plane magneto-optical anisotropy of self-assembled quantum dots

Abstract: We report on a complex nontrivial behavior of the optical anisotropy of quantum dots that is induced by a magnetic field in the plane of the sample. We find that the optical axis either rotates in the opposite direction to that of the magnetic field or remains fixed to a given crystalline direction. A theoretical analysis based on the exciton pseudospin Hamiltonian unambiguously demonstrates that these effects are induced by isotropic and anisotropic contributions to the heavy-hole Zeeman term, respectively. T… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation is more complicated for the Voigt measurements, as it is neither possible to assign the measured g factors to a specific carrier, nor to establish their sign: it is a priori not clear which of the two linearly polarized Zeeman splittings belongs to which transition. It has been shown for quantum wells [48] and ensembles of quantum dots [49] that the in-plane orientation of the linear polarization axis depends on the relative in-plane orientation of the electron and hole spin. Details of the hole state, such as light-hole intermixing and the nonlinear remote-band coupling of the magnetic field to the hole spin, can lead to the peculiar situation in which the in-plane orientation of the polarization axis depends nontrivially on the in-plane magnetic-field orientation [49].…”
Section: -8mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The situation is more complicated for the Voigt measurements, as it is neither possible to assign the measured g factors to a specific carrier, nor to establish their sign: it is a priori not clear which of the two linearly polarized Zeeman splittings belongs to which transition. It has been shown for quantum wells [48] and ensembles of quantum dots [49] that the in-plane orientation of the linear polarization axis depends on the relative in-plane orientation of the electron and hole spin. Details of the hole state, such as light-hole intermixing and the nonlinear remote-band coupling of the magnetic field to the hole spin, can lead to the peculiar situation in which the in-plane orientation of the polarization axis depends nontrivially on the in-plane magnetic-field orientation [49].…”
Section: -8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown for quantum wells [48] and ensembles of quantum dots [49] that the in-plane orientation of the linear polarization axis depends on the relative in-plane orientation of the electron and hole spin. Details of the hole state, such as light-hole intermixing and the nonlinear remote-band coupling of the magnetic field to the hole spin, can lead to the peculiar situation in which the in-plane orientation of the polarization axis depends nontrivially on the in-plane magnetic-field orientation [49]. Only by measuring this dependence would it be possible to attribute the Zeeman splittings to a certain carrier.…”
Section: -8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optical anisotropy of QDs was also studied by applying a magnetic field in the Voigt geometry, which revealed a complex behavior due to shape asymmetry and strain present in self-assembled quantum dots ͑SAQDs͒. [14][15][16][17] In principle, probing different charged excitonic states in QDs could yield different values of the Zeeman splittings if the Coulomb correlations between carriers altered the singleparticle wave function of the strongly confined carriers. Coulomb interactions between carriers confined in QDs are exemplified by the rich optical spectra of multiply charged excitonic complexes demonstrating the role of exchange interactions between electrons or holes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For observation of a second spherical harmonic it is known from the above that the axis of the polarization vector must be fixed to a distinct crystal axis independent of the orientation of the magnetic field vector [24]. This situation is displayed in Fig.…”
Section: Optical Polarization Rotation Induced By In-plane Magnetic Fmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, due to the heavy-hole light-hole mixing in the valence bands of QDs, which is certainly present, additional matrix elements arise in the angular momentum operator. They can in principle be taken into account in empirical parameters, when the optical response in modelled quantitatively [24]. To fully take into account the valence band mixing in the framework of the above formalism, clearly additional data is required.…”
Section: Optical Polarization Rotation Induced By In-plane Magnetic Fmentioning
confidence: 99%