2005
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.71.041904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous swelling of lipid bilayer stacks is caused by softening of the bending modulus

Abstract: Arrays of bilayers of the lipid dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine ͑DMPC͒ exhibit anomalous swelling as the temperature decreases from T = 27°C toward the main phase transition at T M = 24°C, within the fluid L ␣ thermodynamic phase. Analysis of diffuse x-ray scattering data from oriented stacks of biological lipid bilayers now makes it possible to obtain the bending modulus K C and the bulk compressibility modulus B separately. We report results that show that the measured bending modulus K C for DMPC decreases b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
83
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
14
83
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The slope of the force-distance curve in the fluid phase is again smaller than in the gel phase and B is determined to B > 3.3 · 10 6 N/m 2 (interrupted by the bilayer rupture). All values for B agree quite well with and lie quite in the middle of the broad range of values reported in the literature (23,30,37,38). While the energy to compress the membrane stack is comparable in gel (ripple) and fluid phase, the stack is distinctly harder to compress in the range of critical swelling.…”
Section: Force Curvessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The slope of the force-distance curve in the fluid phase is again smaller than in the gel phase and B is determined to B > 3.3 · 10 6 N/m 2 (interrupted by the bilayer rupture). All values for B agree quite well with and lie quite in the middle of the broad range of values reported in the literature (23,30,37,38). While the energy to compress the membrane stack is comparable in gel (ripple) and fluid phase, the stack is distinctly harder to compress in the range of critical swelling.…”
Section: Force Curvessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Using K A and d HH from our previous results, we obtain κ b ) 21.9 ( 1.6k B T. Experiments have measured 16.7k B T from X-ray data, 85 13.5k B T from pipet aspiration, 7 31.4k B T from thermally excited shape fluctuation, 86 and 32.1k B T from all-optical measurement. 87 Our estimate lies inside the range of the experimental values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Note that this value is slightly lower than the value reported for DMPC under full hydration of d z = 66Å [18]. From MD simulations [9] ethanol was reported to decrease d z in DMPC/ethanol stacks.…”
contrasting
confidence: 44%