2003
DOI: 10.1111/1475-682x.00067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomie and Strain: Context and Consequences of Merton's Two Theories

Abstract: Robert Merton presented two, not always clearly differentiated theories in his seminal explorations on the social-structure-and-anomie paradigm: a strain theory and an anomie theory. A one-sided focus on Merton's strain theory in the secondary literature has unnecessarily restricted the power and effectiveness of Merton's anomie theory. For although structural strain is one way to explain why deviance occurs in the context of anomie, it is not the only way. We contend that scholars who are critical of strain t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Attention to these distinctions is necessary as scholars have noted that two sources of confusion often surround the study of anomie: (a) a misunderstanding exists in the differences between Merton's theory of anomie and Merton's theory of strain (Featherstone and Deflem, 2003) and, (b) a blurring of lines has evolved between Merton's strain theory and the characterization of anomy or anomia in the psychology literature (Orru, 1987). As these distinctions are central to understanding our contributions to the ethics and marketing literature, we now delineate them (Figure 1) Merton (1964Merton ( , 1968 built upon Durkheim's work in an effort to explain how the rates of deviant behavior may vary in different social structures.…”
Section: Anomie and The Marketing Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Attention to these distinctions is necessary as scholars have noted that two sources of confusion often surround the study of anomie: (a) a misunderstanding exists in the differences between Merton's theory of anomie and Merton's theory of strain (Featherstone and Deflem, 2003) and, (b) a blurring of lines has evolved between Merton's strain theory and the characterization of anomy or anomia in the psychology literature (Orru, 1987). As these distinctions are central to understanding our contributions to the ethics and marketing literature, we now delineate them (Figure 1) Merton (1964Merton ( , 1968 built upon Durkheim's work in an effort to explain how the rates of deviant behavior may vary in different social structures.…”
Section: Anomie and The Marketing Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, sociology scholars maintain that each theory is distinct (Baumer, 2007;Featherstone and Deflem, 2003). Unlike Merton's (1968) theory of anomie, the theory of strain incorporates both the cultural and social structures of a social system.…”
Section: Anomie and The Marketing Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the inconsistent mix between macro-level "social structure and anomie" reasoning and the micro-level "goal orientation, opportunity, anomie and crime" paradigm has led some to conclude that Merton's theoretical stand on anomie is too confusing (see Featherstone & Deflem, 2003).…”
Section: Merton's Theory Of Anomiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Featherstone, & Deflem, 2003;Orrù, 1987;Zhao, 2007). The operationalization of anomie as an individual level construct presents anomie as a state of mind: a set of beliefs, feelings and attitudes in the individual's mind (Davol & Reimanis, 1959;McClosky & Schaar, 1965).…”
Section: Empirical Examinations Of Anomiementioning
confidence: 99%