1981
DOI: 10.1002/1098-108x(198123)1:1<44::aid-eat2260010105>3.0.co;2-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anorexia nervosa as a defense against anaclitic depression

Abstract: This paper atempts a developmental understanding of the anaclitic depression which frequently underlies anorexia nervosa. Familial lapses in transactional boundaries are viewed as leading to a maternal overinvolvement or unavailability during the practicing subphase of the separation‐in‐dividuation process. The future anorectic is consequently arrested at a sensorimotor level of self and object representations with no ability to evoke a representation of the object in its absence. Such individuals remain vulne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Bruce and Steiger (2005) claim that obsessionality, perfectionism and rigidity appear to be clear-cut risk and maintenance factors for anorexia nervosa. These findings contradict Sugarman and Quinlan's (1991) view of anorexia as a defense against depression, as well as other studies suggesting that depression and anxiety are at the root of anorexic symptomatology (McElroy, Kotwal, Keck & Hagop, 2005;Tchanturia et al, 2004) and persist long after recovery (Holtkamp et al, 2005).…”
Section: Stated Incontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Bruce and Steiger (2005) claim that obsessionality, perfectionism and rigidity appear to be clear-cut risk and maintenance factors for anorexia nervosa. These findings contradict Sugarman and Quinlan's (1991) view of anorexia as a defense against depression, as well as other studies suggesting that depression and anxiety are at the root of anorexic symptomatology (McElroy, Kotwal, Keck & Hagop, 2005;Tchanturia et al, 2004) and persist long after recovery (Holtkamp et al, 2005).…”
Section: Stated Incontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, treatment of the depression which underlies the bulimia is a crucial aspect of this patient's management. Unfortunately the anaclitic depression, now recognized as a common psychodynamic substrate in the severly eating disordered patient (Sugarman et al, 1981), is difficult to treat because of the relative inaccessability of the conflicts involved. Thus, for G.F., the prognosis must be guarded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the standpoint of theory, the pathological separation distress of eating disordered patients has been primarily understood as resulting from a failure to achieve independence via resolution of the developmental task of separation-individuation from the maternal object (Sugarman, Quinlan, & Devenis, 1981). However, independence is but one side of separation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%