1966
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Another View of the Ultrastructure of Cucurbita Phloem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
5

Year Published

1968
1968
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This particular phenomenon does not strictly separate the sieve elements with dispersing and nondispersing P-protein bodies. The displacement of P-protein bodies toward the sieve plates may occur in sieve elements with the usual ontogeny of the P-protein bodies (e.g., see references 2,8). The dispersal or nondispersal of the P-protein bodies can be related to the position of the sieve elements in the complex phloem system of Cucurbita.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This particular phenomenon does not strictly separate the sieve elements with dispersing and nondispersing P-protein bodies. The displacement of P-protein bodies toward the sieve plates may occur in sieve elements with the usual ontogeny of the P-protein bodies (e.g., see references 2,8). The dispersal or nondispersal of the P-protein bodies can be related to the position of the sieve elements in the complex phloem system of Cucurbita.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, callose formation during pore development may nonetheless be important in determining the flow characteristics of the pore. Some authors have noted that deposition of callose on the face of the end wall where the pore will form is associated with the cessation of wall thickening at that point, so that in the mature sieve plate, the pore openings are in slight depressions in the face of the wall (Evert et al, 1966;Deshpande, 1974Deshpande, , 1975. It is proposed that callose actually restricts wall growth.…”
Section: The Callose Lining May Determine the Flow Characteristics Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others reject the idea that callose replaces original cell wall material and propose that pore formation involves degradation of the original material as well as some callose. According to this view, the main function of callose deposition is to restrict wall thickening in the region in which the pore will form (Evert et al, 1966;Deshpande, 1974Deshpande, , 1975.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific solute transporters mediate SE composition (for review, see Lalonde et al, 2003;Sauer, 2007), and their specificities and patterns of expression ensure a qualitative control on the phloem sap composition of a particular sieve tube (ST). Sap exchange between adjacent STs in a vascular bundle, however, is possible, as lateral sieve areas have been observed in angiosperms (Esau and Cheadle, 1959;Evert et al, 1966;Walsh and Melaragno, 1976), and osmolytes can also be exchanged between SEs by unloading and subsequent reloading of the SE (Thorpe and Minchin, 1987). The composition of phloem sap is not constant and can vary between day and night, for example, in barley (Hordeum vulgare; Winter et al, 1992), grapevine (Vitis vinifera; Gholami et al, 2004), and Ricinus (Smith and Milburn, 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%