ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2013 Preliminary Determination: Quantitative Analysis

Halverson, Mark A.; Rosenberg, Michael; Wang, W.; Zhang, J.; Mendon, Vrushali V.; Athalye, Rahul A.; Xie, YuLong; Hart, Reid; Goel, Supriya

doi:10.2172/1734448

Cited by 3 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The technical analysis process, model descriptions and results were presented in PNNL's technical report titled Achieving the 30% Goal: Energy and Cost Savings Analysis of ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010, referred to in this report as Energy and Cost Savings Analysis of ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010(Thornton et al 2011. The prototype models used in the analysis, their development, and the climate locations were described in detail in the quantitative determination and are available for download 1 (Halverson et al 2014;DOE 2014b).…”

Section: Contents Of the Reportmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The analysis used 16 prototype building models which were simulated in 15 climate locations, and developed in collaboration with SSPC 90.1. These prototype models, their development, and the climate locations were described in detail in the quantitative determination and are available for download (Halverson et al 2014;DOE 2014b). PNNL selected six of the prototype buildings and developed cost estimates for them in five climate locations.…”

Section: Building Prototypes and Climate Locationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The other addenda do not have quantifiable savings, had no savings, do not directly affect building energy usage, or they could not be quantified during the determination quantitative analysis. The addenda are described in more detail in the report documenting the determination quantitative analysis (Halverson et al 2014).…”

Section: Cost Estimate Items From 901-2010 Addendamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The first step in developing the incremental cost estimates was to define the items to be estimated, such as specific pieces of equipment and their installation. Part of the cost item information was extracted from the prototype building energy model inputs and outputs, and from addenda descriptions in the determination quantitative analysis report (Halverson et al 2014). In some cases, the prototype models do not include sufficient design detail to provide the basis for cost estimates, and additional details were developed to support the cost estimating effort.…”

Section: Incremental Cost Estimate Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The baseline control type for the prototype is modeled as a two-stage capacity control (Halverson et al 2014), and modulating control of boiler capacity is included for the advanced case. Several boiler suppliers were polled and an incremental cost of between $800 and $1000 was quoted for using a modulating burner instead of a two-stage burner on boilers below 4 million Btus/hr capacity.…”

Section: Addendum: 901-10ammentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

National Cost-effectiveness of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2013

Hart¹,

Athalye²,

Halverson³

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Building Energy Codes Program supports the upgrade and implementation of building energy codes and standards, which set minimum requirements for energyefficient design and construction for new and renovated buildings, and impact energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for the life of buildings. Continuous improvement of building energy efficiency is achieved by periodically updating model energy codes for commercial and residential buildings. Through consensus-based code development processes, DOE recommends revisions and amendments, supporting technologically feasible and economically justified energy efficiency measures. Ensuring that model code changes impacting the cost of building construction, maintenance, and energy services are cost-effective also encourages their adoption and implementation at the state and local levels. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) prepared this analysis to support DOE in evaluating the energy and economic impacts associated with updated codes in commercial buildings. The purpose of this analysis is to examine the cost-effectiveness of the 2013 edition of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES 1 Standard 90.1 (ANSI/ASHRAE/IES 2013). Standard 90.1 is developed by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard Standing Project Committee (SSPC) 90.1. It is the model energy standard for commercial and multifamily residential buildings over three floors (42 USC 6833). PNNL analyzed the cost-effectiveness of changes in Standard 90.1 from 90.1-2010 to 90.1-2013, as applied in commercial buildings across the United States. During the development of new editions of Standard 90.1, the cost-effectiveness of individual changes (addenda) is often calculated to support the deliberations of ASHRAE Standard Standing Project Committee (SSPC) 90.1. The ASHRAE process, however, does not include analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the entire package of addenda from one edition of the standard to the next, which is of particular interest to adopting State and local governments. Providing States with an analysis of costeffectiveness may encourage more rapid adoption of newer editions of energy codes based on Standard 90.1. This information may also inform the development of future editions of Standard 90.1.To establish the cost-effectiveness of Standard 90.1-2013, three main tasks were addressed:• Identification of building elements impacted by the updated standard • Allocation of associated installation, maintenance, and replacement costs • Cost-effectiveness analysis of required changes In addition to installation, maintenance, and replacement costs, energy cost differences were needed to determine cost-effectiveness. The energy costs for each edition of Standard 90.1 were determined previously under the development of Standard 90.1-2013, as described below.The current analysis builds on the previous PNNL analysis (as outlined in Section 5.2) of the energy use and energy cost saving impacts of Standard 90.1-2013 compared to pre...

show abstract

Section: Contents Of the Reportmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Building Prototypes and Climate Locationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Cost Estimate Items From 901-2010 Addendamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Incremental Cost Estimate Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Addendum: 901-10ammentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

National Cost-effectiveness of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2013

Hart¹,

Athalye²,

Halverson³

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Comparative energy performance evaluation and uncertainty analysis of two building archetype development methodologies: A case study of high-rise residential buildings in Qatar

Moujahed

Sezer

Hou

et al. 2022

Energy and Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

National Cost-effectiveness of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2016

Hart¹,

Myer²,

Halverson³

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Building Energy Codes Program supports the upgrade and implementation of building energy codes and standards, which set minimum requirements for energyefficient design and construction for new and renovated buildings, and impact energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for the life of buildings. Continuous improvement of building energy efficiency is achieved by periodically updating model energy codes for commercial and residential buildings. Through consensus-based code development processes, DOE recommends revisions and amendments, supporting technologically feasible and economically justified energy efficiency measures. Ensuring that model code changes impacting the cost of building construction, maintenance, and energy services are cost-effective also encourages their adoption and implementation at the state and local levels. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) prepared this analysis to support DOE in evaluating the energy and economic impacts associated with updated codes in commercial buildings. The purpose of this analysis is to examine the cost-effectiveness of the 2013 edition of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES 1 Standard 90.1 (ANSI/ASHRAE/IES 2013). Standard 90.1 is developed by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard Standing Project Committee (SSPC) 90.1. It is the model energy standard for commercial and multifamily residential buildings over three floors (42 USC 6833). PNNL analyzed the cost-effectiveness of changes in Standard 90.1 from 90.1-2010 to 90.1-2013, as applied in commercial buildings across the United States. During the development of new editions of Standard 90.1, the cost-effectiveness of individual changes (addenda) is often calculated to support the deliberations of ASHRAE Standard Standing Project Committee (SSPC) 90.1. The ASHRAE process, however, does not include analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the entire package of addenda from one edition of the standard to the next, which is of particular interest to adopting State and local governments. Providing States with an analysis of costeffectiveness may encourage more rapid adoption of newer editions of energy codes based on Standard 90.1. This information may also inform the development of future editions of Standard 90.1. To establish the cost-effectiveness of Standard 90.1-2013, three main tasks were addressed: • Identification of building elements impacted by the updated standard • Allocation of associated installation, maintenance, and replacement costs • Cost-effectiveness analysis of required changes In addition to installation, maintenance, and replacement costs, energy cost differences were needed to determine cost-effectiveness. The energy costs for each edition of Standard 90.1 were determined previously under the development of Standard 90.1-2013, as described below. The current analysis builds on the previous PNNL analysis (as outlined in Section 5.2) of the energy use and energy cost saving impacts of Standard 90.1-2013 compared to ...

show abstract

ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2013 Preliminary Determination: Quantitative Analysis

Cited by 3 publications

References 1 publication

National Cost-effectiveness of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2013

National Cost-effectiveness of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2013

Comparative energy performance evaluation and uncertainty analysis of two building archetype development methodologies: A case study of high-rise residential buildings in Qatar

National Cost-effectiveness of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2016

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About