2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2999(03)02078-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antagonist pharmacology of adenosine A2B receptors from rat, guinea pig and dog

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining the results of this previous study by Kim et al (2002) with our data, we propose that human, rabbit, and mouse A 2B ARs have similar binding characteristics, whereas dog and rat A 2B ARs can be categorized as having lower binding potency for xanthine antagonists. Our results also agree with those of Fozard et al (2003), who suggested that antagonist pharmacology of the dog A 2B AR differs from that of A 2B ARs from human, rat, and guinea pig based on pK b values calculated from bioassays of various smooth muscle preparations. In contrast, we observed no species differences in agonist binding to A 2B ARs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combining the results of this previous study by Kim et al (2002) with our data, we propose that human, rabbit, and mouse A 2B ARs have similar binding characteristics, whereas dog and rat A 2B ARs can be categorized as having lower binding potency for xanthine antagonists. Our results also agree with those of Fozard et al (2003), who suggested that antagonist pharmacology of the dog A 2B AR differs from that of A 2B ARs from human, rat, and guinea pig based on pK b values calculated from bioassays of various smooth muscle preparations. In contrast, we observed no species differences in agonist binding to A 2B ARs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In a search for more selective antagonists for the human A 2B AR, Kim et al (2000Kim et al ( , 2002 noticed that certain xanthine antagonists bound heterologously expressed recombinant rat A 2B ARs with up to 10-fold lower affinity compared with human A 2B ARs. Fozard et al (2003) also suggested that antagonist pharmacology of A 2B ARs differs significantly among human, dog, rat, and guinea pig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding that CGS-21680, a prototype A 2A receptor agonist, was inactive at 1 M suggests that the A 2A receptor may be ruled out (28). Furthermore, the potency of NECA is within the range of the potency described for this agonist as an A 2B receptor agonist (17). Likewise, and by the same argument, we may also discard the influence of A 3 receptors, because 2-Cl-IB-MECA, a high-affinity A 3 receptor agonist (27), was inactive as a vasoconstrictor and instead induced relaxations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The stimulation of A 2B receptor in human beings activates the mast cells [13] , and as a result, increases the release of IL-8 [14] . The inhibition of A 2B receptors can have helpful therapeutic effects on asthma [15] and lead to the decrease of bronchospasm in response to such stimuli as AMP [16] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%