Mucin secretion is regulated by extracellular signaling molecules emanating from local, neuronal, or endocrine sources. Quantifying the rate of this secretion is important to understanding how the exocytic process is regulated, and also how goblet/mucous cells synthesize and release mucins under control and pathological conditions. Consequently, measuring mucins in a quantitatively accurate manner is the key to many experiments addressing these issues. This paper describes procedures used to determine agonist-induced mucin secretion from goblet cells in human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cell cultures. It begins with primary epithelial cell culture, offers methods for purifying MUC5AC and MUC5B mucins for standards, and describes five different microtiter plate binding assays which use various probes for mucins. A polymeric mucin-specific antibody is used in standard and sandwich ELISA formats for two assays while the others target the extensive glycosylated domains of mucins with lectin, periodate oxidation, and antibody-based probes. Comparing the data derived from the different assays applied to the same set of samples of HBE cell cultures indicates a qualitative agreement between baseline and agonist stimulated mucin release; however, the polymeric mucin-specific assays yield substantially lower values than the assays using nonspecific molecular reporters. These results indicate that the more non-specific assays are suitable to assess overall secretory responses by goblet cells, but are likely unsuited for specific measurements of polymeric mucins, per se.
1 The bronchoconstrictor response to adenosine is markedly and selectively increased following ovalbumin (OA) challenge in actively sensitized, Brown Norway rats. We present a pharmacological analysis of the receptor mediating this response. 2 Like adenosine, the broad-spectrum adenosine receptor agonist, NECA, induced dose-related bronchoconstriction in actively sensitized, OA-challenged animals. In contrast, CPA, CGS 21680 and 2-Cl-IB-MECA, agonists selective for A 1 A 2A and A 3 receptors, respectively, induced no, or minimal, bronchoconstriction. 3 Neither the selective A 1 receptor antagonist, DPCPX, nor the selective A 2A receptor antagonist, ZM 241385, blocked the bronchoconstrictor response to adenosine. 4 MRS 1754, which has similar a nity for rat A 2B and A 1 receptors, failed to block the bronchoconstrictor response to adenosine despite blockade of the A 1 receptor-mediated bradycardia induced by NECA. 5 8-SPT and CGS 15943, antagonists at A 1 , A 2A , and A 2B but not A 3 receptors, inhibited the bronchoconstrictor response to adenosine. However, the degree of blockade (approximately 3 fold) did not re¯ect the plasma concentrations, which were 139 and 21 times greater than the K B value at the rat A 2B receptor, respectively. 6 Adenosine and NECA, but not CPA, CGS 21680 or 2-Cl-IB-MECA, induced contraction of parenchymal strip preparations from actively sensitized OA-challenged animals. Responses to adenosine could not be antagonized by 8-SPT or MRS 1754 at concentrations 450 times their a nities at the rat A 2B receptor. 7 The receptor mediating the bronchoconstrictor response to adenosine augmented following allergen challenge in actively sensitized BN rats cannot be categorized as one of the four recognized adenosine receptor subtypes.
Parenchymal strips prepared from lungs removed from actively sensitised Brown Norway rats challenged with allergen show hyperresponsiveness to adenosine. The response is mast cell mediated and a preliminary pharmacological analysis suggested the involvement of a receptor (or receptors) that could not be classified as any of the known adenosine receptor subtypes. We present a further analysis of the response. Male Brown Norway (BN) rats, actively sensitised to ovalbumin (OA), were challenged intratracheally with OA and killed 3 h later to provide parenchymal strip preparations. The augmented contractile responses to adenosine were partially blocked by the 5-HT receptor antagonist, methysergide, or the A(1) receptor antagonist, DPCPX, and abolished in the presence of both antagonists. Responses to high concentrations of the A(1) receptor agonist, CPA were, like those to adenosine, augmented on tissues from allergen-challenged animals and blocked by a combination of methysergide and DPCPX. The A(3) receptor agonist, Cl-IB-MECA, did not contract the tissue, but partially blocked the response to adenosine. A combination of Cl-IB-MECA and methysergide induced a similar degree of blockade to that seen with either drug given alone. Combination of Cl-IB-MECA and/or methysergide with DPCPX abolished the response to adenosine. The effects of the A(3) receptor agonist, inosine, were augmented on tissues from allergen-challenged animals and markedly inhibited by disodium cromoglycate, methysergide or Cl-IB-MECA. Responses to adenosine were abolished when parenchymal strips were taken from rats pretreated 48 h previously with pertussis toxin. 8-SPT, CGS 15943, XAC, MRS 1754, DPCPX and theophylline, at concentrations which inhibit the A(1) A(2A) and/or A(2B) receptors but have negligible affinity for the rat A(3) receptor, inhibited responses to adenosine, but high concentrations were required and blockade was incomplete. MRS 1523 and MRS 1191, which are antagonists at the rat A(3) receptor, had no effect on the response to adenosine. The present results support and clarify our earlier conclusion that an atypical receptor mechanism mediates contraction of the parenchymal strip prepared from the lungs of actively sensitised BN rats challenged with allergen to adenosine. The response arises from a combined effect of adenosine on the A(1) receptor and a receptor with similarities to the A(3) receptor, but where Cl-IB-MECA behaves as an antagonist and MRS 1523 and MRS 1191 are inactive at concentrations that substantially exceed their affinities for the rat A(3) receptor.
The mechanism by which 2(3H)-benzothiazolone, 4-hydroxy-7-[2-[[2-[[3-(2-phenylethoxy)propyl]-sulphonyl]ethyl]amino]ethyl]-monohydrochloride (AR-C68397AA; viozan), a dual dopamine D2/beta2-adrenoceptor agonist which has shown promise in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), inhibits the extravasation of plasma protein induced by capsaicin in the tracheas of Brown Norway rats has been re-evaluated. Viozan (10-30 microg/kg given intratracheally; i.t.) inhibited dose-dependently the extravasation of plasma protein tagged with Evans Blue into rat trachea induced by capsaicin (10 microg/kg i.t.). Similar effects were seen with the selective beta2-adrenoceptor agonist, salbutamol (3-10 microg/kg i.t.), but the selective dopamine D2 receptor agonist, quinagolide (10-30 microg/kg i.t.), was inactive. The effects of viozan and salbutamol were abolished by propranolol (3 mg/kg) given intraperitoneally (i.p.) but unaffected by sulpiride (3 mg/kg i.p.). Thus, in c,ontrast to claims in the literature, a functional response to dopamine D2 receptor activation in a preclinical model of oedema arising from sensory nerve fibre activation in the rat lung could not be demonstrated. Moreover, no qualitative difference could be demonstrated between the response to a dual D2/beta2-adrenoceptor agonist and a selective beta2-adrenoceptor agonist. The observations call into question whether a dual D2/beta2-adrenoceptor agonist such as viozan would bring added benefit over established selective beta2-adrenoceptor agonists in the therapy
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.