2013
DOI: 10.9790/487x-0935257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement- A Hypothetical Approach

Abstract: One of the most important assets that differentiate two organizations is its

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Training and development, leadership and rewards, internal communication, are considered as key determinants of employee engagement among individuals working in hotel establishments (AL-Syaidh et al, 2016;Darawshehet al, 2016;Zainol et al, 2016;Alkandari et al, 2017). In accordance with Saks (2006) and Arunkumar & Renugadevi (2013): job characteristics, perceived organizational & supervisor support, rewards & recognitions, procedural justices and distributive justices are the key antecedents of improving the level of engagement. High degree of individuals engagement in any company can create several benefits for the two; organizations and individuals like: attract the skilled and talented workforce, foster customer loyalty, enhance organizational profitability and performance, stakeholder value (Arunkumar & Renugadevi, 2013), as well as increasing the level of job satisfaction, organizational attachment and commitment, reduces the intention to resign, and organizational citizenship behavior, because engaged employees don't frequently quit the job (Saks, 2006;Arunkumar & Renugadevi, 2013).…”
Section: Engagement Requirements and Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Training and development, leadership and rewards, internal communication, are considered as key determinants of employee engagement among individuals working in hotel establishments (AL-Syaidh et al, 2016;Darawshehet al, 2016;Zainol et al, 2016;Alkandari et al, 2017). In accordance with Saks (2006) and Arunkumar & Renugadevi (2013): job characteristics, perceived organizational & supervisor support, rewards & recognitions, procedural justices and distributive justices are the key antecedents of improving the level of engagement. High degree of individuals engagement in any company can create several benefits for the two; organizations and individuals like: attract the skilled and talented workforce, foster customer loyalty, enhance organizational profitability and performance, stakeholder value (Arunkumar & Renugadevi, 2013), as well as increasing the level of job satisfaction, organizational attachment and commitment, reduces the intention to resign, and organizational citizenship behavior, because engaged employees don't frequently quit the job (Saks, 2006;Arunkumar & Renugadevi, 2013).…”
Section: Engagement Requirements and Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, they will be engaged in work actions when there is a fair system in the job (Dajani, 2015) because exchange role usually involves reciprocity or repayment principles, such as the action of one side create and lead to a response by another side (Saks, 2006). For example, when individuals receive economic and social-emotional resources from the organizations they work for, they feel obligated to respond showing the engaged behavior inking of repaying (Arunkumar & Renugadevi, 2013).…”
Section: Social Exchange Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Kahn's work, several engagement typologies and definitions have emerged that are often misused in research Shuck & Reio, 2014). Examples of the emergent typologies include employee engagement (Shuck, Adelson, & Reio, 2016), work engagement (Schaufeli, Salanova, González-Romá, & Bakker, 2002), job engagement (Rich, Lepine, & Crawford, 2010) and organizational engagement (Saks, 2006). In this study, engagement refers to employee engagement.…”
Section: Engagementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, it seems clear that engagement is a good thing for both employee and employer -a sentiment also shared broadly by Human Resource Development (HRD) scholars (e.g. Alagaraja & Shuck, 2015;Saks, 2006;Seijts & Crim, 2006;Shuck & Reio, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation