“…Finally, it was taken off the market in 1971 subsequent to the elegant report by Herbset and coworkers who observed that in utero DES exposure has predisposed these girls "known as DES daughters" to develop an extremely rare type of cervicovaginal clear-cell adenocarcinoma (CCAC) at a young age (Herbst et al, 1971). In addition to a more than 100-fold increased risk of CCAC, DES daughters also suffered from increased incidences of vaginal dysplasia, vaginal and cervical adenosis, malformations of the cervix, vagina, and uterus, infertility and pregnancy complications (Rubin, 2007).…”