2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3075448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antenna Delay Calibration of UWB Nodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples are Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [ 34 ] and nonparametric method taking into account the antenna delay statistics [ 35 ]. Other procedures rely on genetic-like algorithms [ 36 ] or customized ranging message schemes [ 37 ]. The aforementioned compensation methods target the estimation of the overall antenna delay among any pair of UWB nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples are Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [ 34 ] and nonparametric method taking into account the antenna delay statistics [ 35 ]. Other procedures rely on genetic-like algorithms [ 36 ] or customized ranging message schemes [ 37 ]. The aforementioned compensation methods target the estimation of the overall antenna delay among any pair of UWB nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm relies on an iterative procedure for estimating the antenna delay by minimizing the difference between the true and estimated TOF at each UWB node. Compared with other methods such as [ 34 ], the proposed method converges to the optimal solution and can be applied to conventional ranging schemes, avoiding the definition of custom messages as in [ 37 ]. Outlier identification and removal is here addressed by proposing a modified IFA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, although essential, none of these methods comply with the measurement of the antenna delays of the anchor nodes. Several methods specifically dedicated to the measurement of antenna delays of UWB nodes are available in the literature [ 27 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. These methods usually differ in the adopted TWR principles [ 19 , 21 , 23 ] and the number of TWR sessions performed between a pair of UWB nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%