Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Aglietti, Paolo; Giron, Francesco; Buzzi, Roberto; Biddau, Flavio; Sasso, Francesco

doi:10.2106/00004623-200410000-00004

Cited by 332 publications

(97 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Subjective IKDC knee evaluation: In comparing group A with group B, preoperative and month postoperative evaluation showed statistically nonsignificant change, similar to the observations made by Aglietti P et al [9] Feller JA and Webster KE. [10] and Wagner M et al [5] in their study reported significantly better results for subjective knee evaluation in hamstring group whereas Eriksson K et al [11] and Aglietti P et al [12] reported better results in BPTB group.…”

Section: Intergroup Comparison supporting

confidence: 86%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparative Study of Clinical Outcome of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Graft v/S Hamstring Graft

Uniyal¹,

D²,

Bharath³

et al. 2015

jebmh

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Intergroup Comparison supporting

confidence: 86%

“…[5], [9], [10], [11], [12]  Subjective IKDC evaluation was done at the end of 12 months. There was no difference in both the groups in the terms of effusion, passive motion, knee compartment findings, ligament examination, x-ray findings.…”

Section: Graded Asmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Study of Clinical Outcome of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Graft v/S Hamstring Graft

Uniyal¹,

D²,

Bharath³

et al. 2015

jebmh

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The surgical procedures, such as the choice of graft material (Corry et al, 1999; Aglietti et al, 2004; Beynnon et al, 2005), and rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction (Mikkelsen et al, 2000; Beynnon et al, 2005), are relatively well developed. However, our understanding and knowledge of the factors that contribute to successful rehabilitation, outcome, and patient satisfaction are not yet well investigated.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rehabilitation and recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patients' experiences

Heijne

Axelsson²,

Werner

et al. 2007

Scandinavian Med Sci Sports

120

134

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim was to explore patients' experiences of the rehabilitation process after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Ten participants were enrolled in the study. Semi-structured interviews were performed, focusing on challenges during the post-operative rehabilitation to 1 year after ACL reconstruction. The participants perceived no real choice between operative and non-operative treatment. Only surgery symbolized a full return to the pre-injury level of sports, and surgery was understood as the only way to become a completely restored "functional human being." A major source of frustration was that the meaning of and progress during the rehabilitation did not match their expectations. Three different responses to the challenge of a prolonged rehabilitation were expressed: "going for it,""being ambivalent," and "giving in." Fear of re-injury was common; however, some participants decided not to return to their pre-injury level of sports due to reasons other than physical limitations or fear of re-injury. From a patient perspective, it seems important that the choice of operative or non-operative treatment should be discussed in terms of the meaning and extent of the post-operative rehabilitation and the expected outcomes. There also seems to be a need for more guidance in realistic goal setting and coaching throughout the rehabilitation process.

show abstract

“…Two patients had mild laxity which is reported in all series where hamstrings have been used (6,10,13). It is indeed one of the shortcomings sited when this method of reconstruction is used but it does not seem to affect knee function and stability.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…These include direct repair, extra-articular procedures (6,7) and intra-articular prostheses (8)(9)(10).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Outcome of Arthroscopic Reconstruction Using Quadrupled Hamstrings: A Kenyan Experience

Byakika¹

2010

E Af Orth Jnl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To study the results of arterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repairs using arthroscopic assisted reconstructions using harmstrings. A follow-up rehabilitation programme of immediate mobilisation, weight bearing and extension. Setting: The Nairobi Hospital.Results: All the patients had satisfactory results based on patient satisfaction, freedom from pain and range of movements. Conclusion:Arthroscopically assisted hamstring ACL repair has good results and is to be encouraged.

show abstract

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Cited by 332 publications

References 54 publications

Comparative Study of Clinical Outcome of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Graft v/S Hamstring Graft

Comparative Study of Clinical Outcome of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Graft v/S Hamstring Graft

Rehabilitation and recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patients' experiences

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Outcome of Arthroscopic Reconstruction Using Quadrupled Hamstrings: A Kenyan Experience

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About