2015
DOI: 10.3171/2014.11.spine13959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anterior discectomy/corpectomy and fusion with internal fixation for the treatment of unstable hangman's fractures: a retrospective study of 38 cases

Abstract: OBJECT The object of this study was to describe the authors' method of anterior discectomy/corpectomy and fusion combined with internal fixation for the treatment of unstable hangman's fractures and to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes. METHODS This study included 38 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for unstable hangman's fractures between July 2002 and October 2011 and were follo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differing from the posterior approach; Li et al22 considered posterior approaches as not optimal, noting that they result in significant loss of C1–2 function, and that in a highly unstable Hangman's fracture, posterior fixation of C2–3 results in aggravation of the forward displacement of C-2 because of the intraoperative prone position, which may cause iatrogenic injury with extremely adverse consequences. In their study they used anterior C2–3 intervertebral disc excision or C-3 corpectomy, decompression and reduction, interbody implantation of an autologous iliac bone graft, and internal fixation with a titanium plate, and considered this approach to be a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of unstable hangman's fractures 22.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differing from the posterior approach; Li et al22 considered posterior approaches as not optimal, noting that they result in significant loss of C1–2 function, and that in a highly unstable Hangman's fracture, posterior fixation of C2–3 results in aggravation of the forward displacement of C-2 because of the intraoperative prone position, which may cause iatrogenic injury with extremely adverse consequences. In their study they used anterior C2–3 intervertebral disc excision or C-3 corpectomy, decompression and reduction, interbody implantation of an autologous iliac bone graft, and internal fixation with a titanium plate, and considered this approach to be a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of unstable hangman's fractures 22.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type 1 (horizontal fracture) describes a potentially displaced horizontally orientated fracture line through the body of C2 with an intact axis ring comparable to a Benzel 20 type I fracture.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors published good clinical and radiological results either with an isolated anterior approach (ACDF of C2/3), 20 , 28 , 29 with a posterior-only approach, 30 , 31 as well as with a combined posterior-anterior approach. 32 In a recent review, Murphy et al 23 analyzed up-to-date evidence for the best possible approach (ACDF vs posterior fusion vs anterior-posterior fusion) but they did not find any difference in terms of union, mortality, and complications.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dysphagia was also reported in one case 3,4,[6][7][8][9][10] . Severe persistent dysphagia is caused mainly by dysfunction of the iSLN or HN that traverses the upper cervical anterior region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%