2009
DOI: 10.5453/jhps.44.313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropogenic Radioactivity in Aerosol

Abstract: Large-scale injection of huge amounts of any pollutant into the atmosphere has health and environmental impacts, but also provides an opportunity for understanding associated bio-geochemical cycles. Radiologically important, long-lived radionuclides emitted by atmospheric nuclear tests, such as 90 Sr, 137 Cs, and plutonium isotopes, are good examples. These radionuclides remain in the biosphere, although dilution and radioactive decay have mitigated their radiation impact, which is at present negligible compar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is useful to look at our 129 I deposition results in the context of the deposition of other anthropogenic radioisotopes over the same time period. Figure S3 (Supporting Information) compares the monthly 129 I deposition in Tsukuba in 1986 with 90 Sr and 137 Cs deposition during the same period . On April 26, 1986, the Chernobyl accident released various radionuclides into the atmosphere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is useful to look at our 129 I deposition results in the context of the deposition of other anthropogenic radioisotopes over the same time period. Figure S3 (Supporting Information) compares the monthly 129 I deposition in Tsukuba in 1986 with 90 Sr and 137 Cs deposition during the same period . On April 26, 1986, the Chernobyl accident released various radionuclides into the atmosphere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atmospheric fallout samples (precipitation containing airborne particulate dust) have been collected monthly by MRI since the 1960s at their different research stations in Japan. , The samples have already been analyzed for radiocesium and radiostrontium within a framework organized by the MRI . In this study, we selected a subset of samples from four different sites: Akita, located on the Japan Sea side; Tsukuba, located between Tokai reprocessing plant (TRP) and Tokyo; Tokyo, located on the Pacific Ocean side; and Ishigaki, a small island west of Okinawa in Japan’s southernmost prefecture (Figure ).…”
Section: Fallout Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured radiocaesium resuspension 6 in the atmosphere at Kawamata and Namie, Fukushima Prefecture, after the accident 7,8 . In this area, which is 30 to 35 km northwest of the FDNPP and surrounded by heavily contaminated forest, as defined above, the effects of the primary emission of radiocaesium from the FDNPP likely ceased in fall 2011 9,10 ; then, from 2012–2015, the radiocaesium activity concentration in the air slowly decreased, although seasonal fluctuations were observed, with increases during the warm season and decreases during the cold season (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the initial primary emission surge from the F1NPP site by the accident decreased circa the fall of 2011 17,18 , radiocaesium has been detected continuously in the atmosphere since 2011. The source of these continuous atmospheric radiocaesium levels is considered to be resuspension (i.e., secondary emissions from polluted surfaces 19 ); notably, the measured radiocaesium concentrations in the range of 10 -1 to 10 -5 Bq m −3 (Supplementary Information Figure S1) have not reached a level with certain health impacts (see Annex in Igarashi et al 13 ). In a typical mountainous village area in Fukushima (see Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%