2012
DOI: 10.3167/ca.2012.300112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropology and What There Is: Reflections on 'Ontology'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the authors above deploy the notion of ontology in diff erent ways and to diff erent eff ects, as both internal discussions and external commentators have shown (Latour 2009;Carrithers et al 2010;Jensen et al 2011;Heywood 2012;Laidlaw 2012). Th ey diff er in what they emphasize of Western, Modern or Euro-American ontology but also, and more generally, in the extent to which their use of regional designations (when they do use them) are substantive or merely heuristic.…”
Section: Naturalism and The Ontological Turnmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the authors above deploy the notion of ontology in diff erent ways and to diff erent eff ects, as both internal discussions and external commentators have shown (Latour 2009;Carrithers et al 2010;Jensen et al 2011;Heywood 2012;Laidlaw 2012). Th ey diff er in what they emphasize of Western, Modern or Euro-American ontology but also, and more generally, in the extent to which their use of regional designations (when they do use them) are substantive or merely heuristic.…”
Section: Naturalism and The Ontological Turnmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…I show how resource extraction ties into the Secoya's view of the cosmos as being in constant transformation; hence, how leaky matters and uncontrolled flows become matters of special concern. In so doing, the chapter speaks to an ongoing theoretical debate concerning the alleged 'essentialism' of the ontological turn in anthropology (Heywood 2012;Pedersen 2012;Bessire 2014;Vigh and Sausdal 2014;Cepek 2016;Holbraad and Pedersen 2017) and how the concern for ontological questions in the context of resource extraction is sometimes-mistakenlytaken as an argument for the claim that oil is a spirit for (at least some) indigenous peoples in the Ecuadorian Amazon (Cepek 2016). Rather than taking this mistaken perception as the point of departure for a critique of an anthropological interest in ontological questions (see Cepek 2016), I argue that oil is dealt with in the spirit of oil, namely as a matter of uncontrolled transformation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independently of whether new materialist outlooks are to be regarded as actual truth claims or 'catalysts to a changed perspective' (Washick and Wingrove 2015, 65), their reliance on scientific evidence in questioning earlier accounts indicates that truth aspirations are not ruled out. They are rather shifted to a meta-ontological level (Heywood 2012), where at stake are not claims about the 'whatness of things' (Woolgar and Lezaun 2013) -their stable identity -but about their contingency, their endless becoming, their continuous emergence and sinking. From this perspective, the material turn results less revolutionary than it seems: rather than a radical departure, it looks a further iteration of the Western metaphysical tradition that Foucault calls the 'analytics of truth': the search for an access to universal truth.…”
Section: The Other Side Of New Materialist Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%