2010
DOI: 10.2147/dmsott.s15154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropometric cutoff values for detecting metabolic abnormalities in Jordanian adults

Abstract: ObjectivesTo determine cutoff values for body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) as indicators of metabolic abnormalities in the adult Jordanian population.MethodsA structured questionnaire was administered to collect relevant information. Anthropometric measurements and biochemical measurements were carried out. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses were used to examine the overall discriminatory power of the four anthropometric in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
17
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The cutoff values for WHR in the Saudi cohort were 0.89 and 0.81 for men and women respectively, which is lower than what has been reported among Qataris 19 at 0.90 and 0.88 for men and women respectively, and Omanis 18 at 0.91 for both men and women, but higher than what has been proposed for Jordanians at 0.88 for men and 0.82 for women. 20 When comparing our results with Caucasians, we had a lower WHR for men (0.89 versus 0.95) but a higher WHR for women (0.84 versus 0.80). 34 The proposed cutoff points for WHR in the current study are close to the proposed cutoff values used in the WHO 1998 definition of metabolic syndrome, 35 at 0.89 versus 0.90 for men and 0.84 versus 0.85 for women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The cutoff values for WHR in the Saudi cohort were 0.89 and 0.81 for men and women respectively, which is lower than what has been reported among Qataris 19 at 0.90 and 0.88 for men and women respectively, and Omanis 18 at 0.91 for both men and women, but higher than what has been proposed for Jordanians at 0.88 for men and 0.82 for women. 20 When comparing our results with Caucasians, we had a lower WHR for men (0.89 versus 0.95) but a higher WHR for women (0.84 versus 0.80). 34 The proposed cutoff points for WHR in the current study are close to the proposed cutoff values used in the WHO 1998 definition of metabolic syndrome, 35 at 0.89 versus 0.90 for men and 0.84 versus 0.85 for women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…23 This difference in the WC cutoff values between different ethnic groups could be explained by ethnic differences in socioeconomic status, physical activities, lifestyle and cultural factors that could affect the body composition of each population that consequently uses the WC as a surrogate for abdominal fat. 20 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 Measurements were taken twice and the mean was taken in all cases.Cutoff values for waist circumference were 85 and 80 cm for men and women, respectively; 14 the corresponding waist hip ratios were 0.90 and 0.81 respectively. 15 Blood pressure (BP) was recorded by a trained physicians in the sitting position in the right arm with a mercury sphygmomanometer (Diamond Deluxe BP apparatus, Pune, India). Three readings were taken 5 minutes apart and the mean of the two lower readings was taken as final BP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waist-to-height ratio was considered normal at ≤ 0.5, and elevated if it was > 0.5 (13). Body mass index (BMI) was expressed as the quotient between weight (kg) and height squared (m 2 ).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%