2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00818.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti‐HBc screening of blood donors: a comparison of nine anti‐HBc tests

Abstract: Both PRISM anti-HBc assays revealed that approximately 1.8% of non-prescreened blood donors from Germany were reactive for anti-HBc. Although sensitivity was comparable between both assays, specificity was increased significantly with the PRISM HBcore. High anti-HBc sample cut-off values were indicative for reactivity in other HBV parameters and for concordant results in the nine different anti-HBc assays. Look-back investigations are necessary to estimate the infection risk both of anti-HBc-only positive and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
1
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
59
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Month by month the prevalence varied between 2.9% to 7.2% with an average of 4.6%. Architect Anti-HBc II assay has a good performance in detecting antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (27,28), however discrepancies and low predictive value of anti-HBc assays in countries with low HBV prevalence were previously reported (29)(30)(31)(32)(33). When the prevalence was measured based on the nationality, 9.2% (n = 130/1406) of Syrian and 3.2% (184/5608) of Lebanese were anti-HBc positive, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Month by month the prevalence varied between 2.9% to 7.2% with an average of 4.6%. Architect Anti-HBc II assay has a good performance in detecting antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (27,28), however discrepancies and low predictive value of anti-HBc assays in countries with low HBV prevalence were previously reported (29)(30)(31)(32)(33). When the prevalence was measured based on the nationality, 9.2% (n = 130/1406) of Syrian and 3.2% (184/5608) of Lebanese were anti-HBc positive, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49,50 However, if this strategy is applied in the studied population, the use of anti-HBc would result in the disposal of 36.2% of blood units, with 42.6% of them might actually be safe. The anti-HBs titers in the HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive samples did not illustrate the absence of viral infection, as 65.8% of anti-HBc-/anti-HBs-positive OHB cases showed antiHBs titers of > 100 IU/L (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a serious global health problem affecting two billion people worldwide, and 350 million people suffer from chronic HBV infection [1] . Despite mandatory screening for HBsAg by ELISA for over 20 years, transfusion-associated HBV (TAHBV) continues to be a major problem in India, more so in patients receiving repeated transfusions [2] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%