2016 CIE International Conference on Radar (RADAR) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2016.8059595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-intermittent sampling repeater jamming method based on convex optimization techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhou et al designed an in-pulse orthogonal linear frequency modulation (LFM) phase coded waveform. In view of ISRJ, the waveform was divided into different sub-signals, and its corresponding matched filter was used to reconnoiter, identify and counteract the jamming effectively, but the situation of asynchronous sampling between the jamming and the transmitted signal was not considered [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al designed an in-pulse orthogonal linear frequency modulation (LFM) phase coded waveform. In view of ISRJ, the waveform was divided into different sub-signals, and its corresponding matched filter was used to reconnoiter, identify and counteract the jamming effectively, but the situation of asynchronous sampling between the jamming and the transmitted signal was not considered [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major disadvantage of these methods is that it assumes that the jammer has accurate information about environmental factors and receiver actions. For example, adaptive zero adjustment technology will decay the power of jamming signals, error detection and correction technology can reduce the symbol error rate (SER) of the received information, and anti-jamming methods such as in-phase and quadrature (IQ) imbalance [9] or anti-chirp-jamming [10] can fade the jamming signal influence. Game theory is a dynamic process between the jammer and the transmitter-receiver pairs; it can build a Nash equilibrium between both sides [11], but the jammer needs to employ an efficient jamming strategy, which is also the purpose of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The jamming technique against SAR‐GMTI can always be divided into barrage jamming and deceptive jamming. Barrage jamming can reduce the detection rate of moving targets via concealing the real targets in barrage plaques or strips [4–7]. On the other hand, deceptive jamming makes it difficult to distinguish fact from fable by generating deceptive moving targets which have the similar characteristics of scattering and motion with real ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%