1975
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1975.tb00518.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial Activity of 3‐(l‐Methyl‐5‐Nitro‐2‐Imidazolylmethylideneamino)‐2‐Oxazolidinone

Abstract: The nitroimidazole tested is structurally related to furazolidone in that it contains a 5‐nitro‐imidazole instead of 5‐nitrofuran. The nitroimidazole was much less active in vitro than furazolidone against a spectrum of pathogenic organisms. However, it is active in vivo by oral administration against bacterial infections of mice and its low acute toxicity gives better therapeutic indices than are obtained with furazolidone. Plasma concentrations rise rapidly following oral administration of the nitroimidazole… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1976
1976

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the isolates are more sensitive to furazolidone than to MABN. However, these Pas- teurella strains are more sensitive to MABN than isolates of other genera that we have studied [1]. These findings were indicated by previous re search [1] and were not unexpected.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the isolates are more sensitive to furazolidone than to MABN. However, these Pas- teurella strains are more sensitive to MABN than isolates of other genera that we have studied [1]. These findings were indicated by previous re search [1] and were not unexpected.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, these Pas- teurella strains are more sensitive to MABN than isolates of other genera that we have studied [1]. These findings were indicated by previous re search [1] and were not unexpected. We did not expect the greater varia tion in sensitivity to MABN of the isolates in table I.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations