2012
DOI: 10.4172/2155-9597.1000152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial and Anti-Acanthamoebic Properties of Catha Edulis (Khat)

Abstract: Infectious diseases remain a significant threat to human health, contributing to more than 17 million annual deaths thus indicating an urgent need to identify novel molecules for antimicrobial chemotherapy. Here, the antimicrobial activities of aqueous crude extract of Catha edulis (khat widely used in Africa and southern parts of Arabia) were tested against a panel of microorganisms including Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus magaterium, Micrococcus luteus), Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Brevundimo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parasite load observed among khat users was also lower than the one among non-khat chewers. Even though anti-plasmodial activity of khat is not known yet, there are its reports on its antimicrobial activity against some human pathogens [ 39 , 40 ], and it has also resistance-modifying potential [ 41 ]. The current report was in agreement with the practice documented among some endogenous people of East Africa and Meru tribe of Kenya who use khat for treatment of malaria [ 18 – 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parasite load observed among khat users was also lower than the one among non-khat chewers. Even though anti-plasmodial activity of khat is not known yet, there are its reports on its antimicrobial activity against some human pathogens [ 39 , 40 ], and it has also resistance-modifying potential [ 41 ]. The current report was in agreement with the practice documented among some endogenous people of East Africa and Meru tribe of Kenya who use khat for treatment of malaria [ 18 – 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of tissue culture propagated callus in traditional medicine could serve to reduce the exploitation of wild populations of khat. A few tissue culture protocols, bioactivity and secondary metabolite analysis studies have been published for khat (Elhag, ; El‐Domiaty et al, ; Elhag and Mossa, ; Al‐Hebshi et al, ; Siddiqui et al, ). However, rapid mass propagation of callus and anti‐HIV and antibacterial tests from callus and leaves of mother plants remains major bottlenecks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The varieties of C. edulis in Yemen, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, and Lebanon have been shown to have antibiotic effects against various bacteria in in-vitro studies [8][9][10][11][12]. Fatima et al [8] tested methanol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and water extracts of Catha edulis Forsk in Saudi Arabia against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, and Candida albicans clinical isolates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fatima et al [8] tested methanol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and water extracts of Catha edulis Forsk in Saudi Arabia against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, and Candida albicans clinical isolates. The methanol and DMSO extracts had signi cant zones of inhibition in all the bacteria tested while the aqueous extract was only active against gram positive organisms, particularly Staphylococcus aureus [8] Siddiqui [11] tested methanolic crude extracts of C. edulis purchased from a shop in London against various laboratory-stocked microbes (Escherichia coli, Bacillus magaterium, Brevundimonas diminuta, and Micrococcus luteus) using the antibiotic disc diffusion assay. The researcher established that the extracts had signi cant (breakpoint of 14 mm) antimicrobial effect against all the bacteria tested (zones of inhibition >16 mm for B. magaterium; >19mm for M. luteus) except E. coli (zone of inhibition <11 mm) [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation