1991
DOI: 10.1159/000238830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial Effects of Meropenem and Imipenem against <i>Haemophilus influenzae</i>

Abstract: Phase contrast microscopy, killing curves and turbidimetric growth curves were used in a comparative study of the antibacterial effects of imipenem and meropenem on Haemophilus influenzae. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and their ranges of meropenem and imipenem using five β-lactamase-producing strains of H. influenzae were 0.03 (0.015–0.06) and 0.6 (0.5–1) μg/ml, respectively. Imipenem and meropenem induced spheroplast formation in cultures. Killing curves showed a bacteriostatic activity for me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the emergence of drug-resistant H. influenzae is a concerning issue in Japan, with up to 37.8% strains identified to be BLNAR [ 9 ]. In our patient, IPM/CS was administered as initial empirical therapy; however, the antibacterial effect of IPM/CS against H. influenzae is thought to be weak compared with that of other carbapenems [ 10 ]. Therefore, a different regime could have been used for managing the invasive hemophilus infection in our patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the emergence of drug-resistant H. influenzae is a concerning issue in Japan, with up to 37.8% strains identified to be BLNAR [ 9 ]. In our patient, IPM/CS was administered as initial empirical therapy; however, the antibacterial effect of IPM/CS against H. influenzae is thought to be weak compared with that of other carbapenems [ 10 ]. Therefore, a different regime could have been used for managing the invasive hemophilus infection in our patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%