2010
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial Properties of Synovial Fluid in the Knee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To analyze growth of S. aureus in SF, we compared growth patterns of the CA-MRSA strain USA300 in SF with those in serum and TSB. The number of CFUs indeed decreased in SF (Figure 1A), as noted in a study reporting antimicrobial activity of SF [10]. However, with qPCR analysis, considerable growth was observed in SF, comparable to that in serum (Figure 1B), indicating that SF does not have antimicrobial activity.…”
Section: Effect Of Sf On S Aureussupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To analyze growth of S. aureus in SF, we compared growth patterns of the CA-MRSA strain USA300 in SF with those in serum and TSB. The number of CFUs indeed decreased in SF (Figure 1A), as noted in a study reporting antimicrobial activity of SF [10]. However, with qPCR analysis, considerable growth was observed in SF, comparable to that in serum (Figure 1B), indicating that SF does not have antimicrobial activity.…”
Section: Effect Of Sf On S Aureussupporting
confidence: 73%
“…It has been speculated that biofilm formation plays a key role [7], a notion that is predominantly based on the isolation of biofilmlike agglomerations from cases of joint infection [8]. Furthermore, the synovial fluid (SF) present in joint cavities has been attributed a function in inhibiting killing of S. aureus by neutrophils [9], while in a somewhat contradicting manner it has also been described as antimicrobial [10]. Finally, microbiological evaluations of joint infections are often complicated by the frequency of falsenegative cultures [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1992; Schneider et al. 1992) and it is recognised that culture of synovial fluid is difficult because of a number of potential factors, such as the sequestration of the bacterium into the synovial membrane (McIlwraith 1983) and the bactericidal qualities of the synovial fluid (DeGara 1943; Gruber et al. 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,24 Synovial fluid itself may have bactericidal properties. 25,26 Attempts have been made to improve techniques of culture by using different broths and solid culture media, yet still many cultures have false negative results. 27 Modern recovery techniques such as 16S rDNA PCR (universal detection of bacterial presence based on conserved ribosomal DNA sequences) might enhance recovery, but are not yet capable of detecting patterns of resistance and will not be within reach of every microbiology laboratory.…”
Section: Contrast Mediummentioning
confidence: 99%