2002
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.40.6.2009-2015.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibiotic Resistance, Virulence Gene, and Molecular Profiles of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Isolates from Diverse Sources in Calcutta, India

Abstract: Antibiotic resistance, virulence gene, and molecular profiles of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) non-O157 strains isolated from human stool samples, cow stool samples, and beef samples over a period of 2 years in Calcutta, India, were determined. Resistance to one or more antibiotics was observed in 49.2% of the STEC strains, with some of the strains exhibiting multidrug resistance. The dominant combinations of virulence genes present in the strains studied were stx 1 and stx 2 (44.5% of strains)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
80
2
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
15
80
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus continued surveillance of emerging antimicrobial resistance among zoonotic food-borne pathogens, including STEC is required to ensure public health protection. Although STEC O157: H7 had been considered sensitive to many antibiotics (24), recent results demonstrated resistance of STEC O157:H7, and in special the non-O157 STEC strains (9,12). Results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (Table 2) showed high resistance to tetracycline, cephalothin, amoxicillin and streptomycin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus continued surveillance of emerging antimicrobial resistance among zoonotic food-borne pathogens, including STEC is required to ensure public health protection. Although STEC O157: H7 had been considered sensitive to many antibiotics (24), recent results demonstrated resistance of STEC O157:H7, and in special the non-O157 STEC strains (9,12). Results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (Table 2) showed high resistance to tetracycline, cephalothin, amoxicillin and streptomycin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Specifically, the strains were: Clostridium perfringens CECT 376, Clostridium difficile CECT 531, Shigella ENT CBD8, enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) CECT 685, enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) CECT 729, and Campylobacter jejuni CECT 7572. The primers used were: C. perfringens (16S rDNA) F: ATG CAA GTC GAG CGA (G/T)G, R: TAT GCG GTA TTA ATC T(C/T)C CTT T 27 ; C. difficile (16S rDNA) F: TTG AGC GAT TTA CTT CGG TAA AGA, R: CCA TCC TGT ACT GGC TCA CCT 27 ; Shigella group ( ipaH gene coding for invasion plasmid antigen H) F: GTT CCT TGA CCG CCT TTC CGA TAC, R: CAT TTC CTT CAC GGC AGT GGA 28 ; ETEC ( elt gene coding for thermolabile toxin) F: GCG ACA AAT TAT ACC GTG CT, R: CCG AAT TCT GTT ATA TAT ATG T 29 ; EPEC ( eae gene coding for adhesin) F: AAA CAG GTG AAA CTG TTG CC, R: CTC TGC AGA TTA ACC CTC TGC 30 ; C. jejuni ( hip gene coding for the hippuricase enzyme) F: GAA GAG GGT TTG GGT GGT G, R: AGC TAG CTT CGC ATA ATA ACT TG. 31 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, none of the strains carried the gene in the current study. This variation was associated with geographical changes as stated in previous studies [17,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%