Cefepime is frequently prescribed to treat infections caused by AmpC-producing Gram-negative bacteria. CMY-2 is the most common plasmid-mediated AmpC (pAmpC) -lactamase. Unfortunately, CMY variants conferring enhanced cefepime resistance have been reported. Here, we describe the evolution of CMY-2 to an extended-spectrum AmpC (ESAC) in clonally identical Escherichia coli isolates obtained from a patient. The CMY-2-producing E. coli isolate (CMY-2-Ec) was isolated from a wound. Thirty days later, one CMY-33-producing E. coli isolate (CMY-33-Ec) was detected in a bronchoalveolar lavage fluid sample. Two weeks before the isolation of CMY-33-Ec, the patient received cefepime. CMY-33-Ec and CMY-2-Ec were identical by repetitive extragenic palindromic-PCR (rep-PCR), being of hyperepidemic sequence type 131 (ST131) but showing different -lactam MICs (e.g., cefepime MIC, 16 and <0.5 g/ml for CMY-33-Ec and CMY-2-Ec, respectively). Identical CMY-2-Ec isolates were also found in a rectal swab. CMY-33 differs from CMY-2 by a Leu293-Ala294 deletion. Expressed in E. coli strain DH10B, both CMYs conferred resistance to ceftazidime (>256 g/ml), but the cefepime MICs were higher for CMY-33 than CMY-2 (8 versus 0.25 g/ml, respectively). The k cat /K m or inhibitor complex inactivation (k inact )/K i app (M ؊1 s ؊1 ) indicated that CMY-33 possesses an extended-spectrum -lactamase (ESBL)-like spectrum compared to that of CMY-2 (e.g., cefoxitin, 0.2 versus 0.4; ceftazidime, 0.2 versus not measurable; cefepime, 0.2 versus not measurable; and tazobactam, 0.0018 versus 0.0009, respectively). Using molecular modeling, we show that a widened active site (ϳ4-Å shift) may play a significant role in enhancing cefepime hydrolysis. This is the first in vivo demonstration of a pAmpC that under cephalosporin treatment expands its substrate spectrum, resembling an ESBL. The prevalence of CMY-2-Ec isolates is rapidly increasing worldwide; therefore, awareness that cefepime treatment may select for resistant isolates is critical. E nterobacteriaceae can manifest resistance to third-generation cephalosporins as a result of the production of extended-spectrum -lactamases (ESBLs), chromosomal AmpC (cAmpCs), or plasmid-mediated AmpCs (pAmpCs) (1, 2). In general, ESBLs are inhibited by the commercially available -lactamase inhibitors but hydrolyze well the fourth-generation cephalosporin cefepime (FEP). On the other hand, AmpCs are not inhibited by inhibitors and do not hydrolyze FEP (1, 3-5). Therefore, FEP is suggested for the treatment of infections caused by AmpC producers (6-8).In the past, AmpC variants with enhanced hydrolytic efficiency against FEP were sporadically reported in Enterobacter spp. (8-11), Serratia marcescens (12), and Escherichia coli (13-17). These chromosomal extended-spectrum AmpC -lactamases (cESACs) possess specific amino acid insertions, deletions, duplications, or substitutions in the H-10 helix (also named the R2-loop) that allow better accommodation and hydrolysis of FEP in the serine active site (1,4,11,14). More ...