1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf01643635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibiotikaprophylaxe mit Enoxacin bei extrakorporaler Stoßwellenlithotripsie

Abstract: According to literature, 16 to 35% of operatively removed renal stones harbour bacteria. The efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis with enoxacin in reducing the rate of bacteriuria after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was investigated in a prospective randomized study. Twenty-five patients received a single 400 mg dose of enoxacin one hour before ESWL, 25 patients did not receive an antibiotic. It was found that a single 400 mg dose of enoxacin one hour before ESWL can reduce the rate of bacteriuria… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight met the eligibility criteria for final inclusion in the systematic review. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Eight controlled trials randomized a total of 940 study participants ( Table 1). The incidence of UTI and fever were 4.2% and 3.4%, respectively.…”
Section: Results Of the Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight met the eligibility criteria for final inclusion in the systematic review. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Eight controlled trials randomized a total of 940 study participants ( Table 1). The incidence of UTI and fever were 4.2% and 3.4%, respectively.…”
Section: Results Of the Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,21 The reasons for excluding the 3 RCTs were the evaluation of the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis instead of treatment, 7 the incomplete description of methodology and results, 6 and the inconsistency between results and conclusions. 5 This was also supported by a structured literature review by Bootsma et al 23 that considered merely 4 RCTs, including only 3 of the 8 RCTs in the meta-analysis by Pearle and Roehrborn. 4 There are several limitations to the present study.…”
Section: Quoting the Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 82%
“…27 A previous meta-analysis on this subject published by Pearle and Roehrborn in 1997 included 8 RCTs. 4 Our meta-analysis was on 9 RCTs, excluding 3 RCTs in the study by Pearle and Roehrborn, [5][6][7] and including 2 RCTs released after their metaanalysis was compiled 13,16 and 2 RCTs not detected in their literature search. 19,21 The reasons for excluding the 3 RCTs were the evaluation of the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis instead of treatment, 7 the incomplete description of methodology and results, 6 and the inconsistency between results and conclusions.…”
Section: Quoting the Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a few follow-up studies, the frequency of post-ESWL bacteriuria has been shown to be ≤5% in patients without known risk factors [47][48][49]. In only one [50] of five randomized placebo/non-antibiotic-controlled studies was a significant reduction demonstrated [50][51][52][53][54]. In most studies, the sample size or the frequencies of infections were low and no clear-cut conclusions could be drawn.…”
Section: Extracorporeal Shock-wave Lithotripsy (Eswl)mentioning
confidence: 92%