Abstract:According to literature, 16 to 35% of operatively removed renal stones harbour bacteria. The efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis with enoxacin in reducing the rate of bacteriuria after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was investigated in a prospective randomized study. Twenty-five patients received a single 400 mg dose of enoxacin one hour before ESWL, 25 patients did not receive an antibiotic. It was found that a single 400 mg dose of enoxacin one hour before ESWL can reduce the rate of bacteriuria… Show more
“…Eight met the eligibility criteria for final inclusion in the systematic review. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Eight controlled trials randomized a total of 940 study participants ( Table 1). The incidence of UTI and fever were 4.2% and 3.4%, respectively.…”
Section: Results Of the Systematic Reviewmentioning
“…Eight met the eligibility criteria for final inclusion in the systematic review. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Eight controlled trials randomized a total of 940 study participants ( Table 1). The incidence of UTI and fever were 4.2% and 3.4%, respectively.…”
Section: Results Of the Systematic Reviewmentioning
“…19,21 The reasons for excluding the 3 RCTs were the evaluation of the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis instead of treatment, 7 the incomplete description of methodology and results, 6 and the inconsistency between results and conclusions. 5 This was also supported by a structured literature review by Bootsma et al 23 that considered merely 4 RCTs, including only 3 of the 8 RCTs in the meta-analysis by Pearle and Roehrborn. 4 There are several limitations to the present study.…”
Section: Quoting the Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 82%
“…27 A previous meta-analysis on this subject published by Pearle and Roehrborn in 1997 included 8 RCTs. 4 Our meta-analysis was on 9 RCTs, excluding 3 RCTs in the study by Pearle and Roehrborn, [5][6][7] and including 2 RCTs released after their metaanalysis was compiled 13,16 and 2 RCTs not detected in their literature search. 19,21 The reasons for excluding the 3 RCTs were the evaluation of the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis instead of treatment, 7 the incomplete description of methodology and results, 6 and the inconsistency between results and conclusions.…”
Prophylactic antibiotics could not improve symptoms, and decreased neither the rate of fever and positive urine culture, nor the incidence of urinary tract infection after shock wave lithotripsy. Antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary for shock wave lithotripsy, especially when no or low risk factors are presented.
“…In a few follow-up studies, the frequency of post-ESWL bacteriuria has been shown to be ≤5% in patients without known risk factors [47][48][49]. In only one [50] of five randomized placebo/non-antibiotic-controlled studies was a significant reduction demonstrated [50][51][52][53][54]. In most studies, the sample size or the frequencies of infections were low and no clear-cut conclusions could be drawn.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.