“…The success of humanization, combined with numerous patents protecting the original CDR grafting method (US Patent 5,225,539 to Winter and Jones) and its variations (US Patent 5,693,761 to Queen et al and 5,821,337 to Carter et al) fueled the diversification of humanization methods in the last two decades. Some of the methods developed in the 1990s and 2000s, often called rational methods (Almagro and Strohl 2009), include resurfacing (Padlan 1991), deimmunization (De Groot et al 2006), specificity-determining residues grafting (Tamura et al 2000), superhumanization (Tan et al 2002), human string content optimization (Lazar et al 2007), and germline humanization (Pelat et al 2008). These methods have in common the design of fewer humanized variants to be tested for binding or any other property of interest based on sequence and structural considerations.…”