2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0897-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

298
2,743
21
55

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,808 publications
(3,203 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
298
2,743
21
55
Order By: Relevance
“…The time required for the immune system to produce detectable levels of immunoglobulins typically ranges from 5 to 10 days, but this may take longer in the case of SARS-CoV-2 [7,12,13]. The Immunochromatographic Lateral Flow Assay (Wondfo SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test, China) [14] used in this study detects IgG and IgM combined antibodies in blood, plasma or serum samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time required for the immune system to produce detectable levels of immunoglobulins typically ranges from 5 to 10 days, but this may take longer in the case of SARS-CoV-2 [7,12,13]. The Immunochromatographic Lateral Flow Assay (Wondfo SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test, China) [14] used in this study detects IgG and IgM combined antibodies in blood, plasma or serum samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highly accurate detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 is crucial to combating the pandemic by aiding diagnosis and assessing infection timing, prevalence, duration of antibody response, and potential immunity. Thus far, a variety of antibody tests have been developed using lateral flow rapid tests, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and chemiluminescence (CLIA) platforms, including ones authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for emergency use 2,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] . Despite the progress, few assays differentiate antibody subtypes to glean infection timing with > 99.5 % specificity for both IgG and IgM 22,23 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, NP RT-PCR is the current recommended investigation [31]. Conflicting findings, varying accessibility, and rapid innovation make it challenging to recommend a single ideal serological test [32]. However, the use of available serological testing as an adjunct with either NP or OP RT-PCR has been shown to yield combined sensitivities of >98% [33,34].…”
Section: Preoperative Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%