2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.102.032216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anticipated synchronization in human EEG data: Unidirectional causality with negative phase lag

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This characterizes the anticipated synchronization regime (AS, with mean time delay τ = −39 ms for this example). This counter intuitive regime explains the observed unidirectional influence with negative phase difference verified in LFP monkey data [26,28,29] as well as in human EEG [57]. Moreover, AS could be possibly related to commonly reported short latency in visual systems [58][59][60][61][62][63], olfactory circuits [64], songbirds brain [43] and human perception [65,66].…”
Section: Local Properties At the Receiver Population Modulates Global...mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This characterizes the anticipated synchronization regime (AS, with mean time delay τ = −39 ms for this example). This counter intuitive regime explains the observed unidirectional influence with negative phase difference verified in LFP monkey data [26,28,29] as well as in human EEG [57]. Moreover, AS could be possibly related to commonly reported short latency in visual systems [58][59][60][61][62][63], olfactory circuits [64], songbirds brain [43] and human perception [65,66].…”
Section: Local Properties At the Receiver Population Modulates Global...mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Granger causality (GC) is a nonlinear analysis tool that can determine the direction of neuron interaction and can be used to measure effective connectivity [ 18 ]. It has been widely used to analyze EEG signals [ 19 , 20 ] and has been proven to play an important role in providing EEG change information [ 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, while in many cases the statistically -inferred directed FC goes, e.g., from the phase-leading to the phase-lagging neuronal population [183,184], i.e. respects a sequentiality criterion, in other cases the relation can be inverted, reflecting non-linear interactions between populations, as anticipatory synchronisation [185] or heterogeneities in internal synchrony levels [186]. More explicitly, causality could be captured: by the detection of remote effects on distant regions triggered by interventions in local regions (as in "Dynamic Causal Modelling" [178]); or, by showing that consideration of the past activity of a putative causal source region improves the prediction of the future activity of a target region, as in Granger Causality analyses of neural time-series [187][188][189][190].…”
Section: Application To Neurosciencementioning
confidence: 99%