“…Studies by Lumley (1932), Mitchell (1934), andBugelski (1950) are representative of the use of this method, and their major findings may be summarized as follows: (a) anticipatory errors are much more frequent than perseverative errors, (fr) frequency of such errors is inversely related to their degree of remoteness, even when corrected for opportunity of occurrence, and (c) as learning progresses, the number of far remote associations declines both absolutely and in proportion to the number of near remote assocations.…”