1995
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4526(94)00494-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antiferromagnetic order and spin frustration in UNi4B

Abstract: Antiferromagnetic order and spin frustration in UNiB4Mentink, S.A.M.; Nieuwenhuys, G.J.; Menovsky, A.A.; Mydosh, J.A.; Drost, A.; Frikkee, E. General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain mater… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnetic ordering in UNi4B has clearly been observed by IX÷SR. Also no changes have been found to occur around a temperature of 10 K, where the magnetic susceptibility and the electronic specific heat attain a second maximum, in agreement with the results from neutron diffraction [2], where also no effects were found around 10 K. This supports the conclusion [2] that the second maximum in the specific heat and magnetic susceptibility in UNi4B is not due to an extra phase transition or reorientation of the spins, but that macroscopic properties of UNiaB should be considered as the summation of those of a three-dimensionally ordering antiferromagnet (twothirds) and those of a ferromagnetic linear chain (onethird).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The magnetic ordering in UNi4B has clearly been observed by IX÷SR. Also no changes have been found to occur around a temperature of 10 K, where the magnetic susceptibility and the electronic specific heat attain a second maximum, in agreement with the results from neutron diffraction [2], where also no effects were found around 10 K. This supports the conclusion [2] that the second maximum in the specific heat and magnetic susceptibility in UNi4B is not due to an extra phase transition or reorientation of the spins, but that macroscopic properties of UNiaB should be considered as the summation of those of a three-dimensionally ordering antiferromagnet (twothirds) and those of a ferromagnetic linear chain (onethird).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Since there are two U layers in this structure, the U-U distance along the c-axis is much smaller (3.482 /~), than that in the basal plane (4.953 A). UNi4B orders antiferromagnetically for temperatures below T N = 20 K [1], where it attains a unique and new magnetic structure in the ordered phase [2] (see Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The possibility of the nonlinear Hall effect has been reported in two ferrotoroidic candidate metals UNi 4 B [22] and CuMnAs [23]. However, in the former case, the contact resistance is too high to suppress a local Joule heating, and hence Seebeck effect may reflect the ghost of a giant nonlinear Hall effect even at the disordered state [24,25]; this would also make it difficult to compare with the existing data on current-induced magnetization including its temperature dependence and amplitude [19]. By contrast, the latter one has already succeeded in observing and controlling the nonlinear Hall effect by deflecting Néel vector; this nonlinear response has been considered to come from the anisotropic magnetoresistance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%