2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.06.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antifungal versus antibacterial defence of insect wings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By inhibiting fungal biofilm, the function of the HTE‐Ti surface can be compared to the recent observations made by Ivanova and colleagues, [ 57 ] who showed that the nanostructured wings of the Damselfly repel fungal cells. Although the biofilm inhibiting effect is similar between the Damselfly wing and HTE‐Ti, their mechanisms are quite different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By inhibiting fungal biofilm, the function of the HTE‐Ti surface can be compared to the recent observations made by Ivanova and colleagues, [ 57 ] who showed that the nanostructured wings of the Damselfly repel fungal cells. Although the biofilm inhibiting effect is similar between the Damselfly wing and HTE‐Ti, their mechanisms are quite different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Damselfly wing is a hydrophobic surface which entraps a layer of air between nanopillars, and this air layer reduces the propensity for fungal cells to attach to the surface. [ 57 ] The HTE‐Ti surface is highly hydrophilic and thus there can be no trapped air to exert this effect. The biofilm inhibition observed on HTE‐Ti is therefore more attributable to the mechanical interactions between the fungus and the nanostructures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have investigated how micro/nano-scale topographies affect bacterial adhesion. Discrete, ordered, and hierarchical surface structures from nano-scale to micro-scale were self-assembled, designed, or bioinspired by mimicking natural surfaces (such as skins of marine mammals and sharks, shells of mollusks and crabs, wings of insects and birds, and leaves of plants) [131,132].…”
Section: Topographic Modification Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the cicada, the protrusions are irregular and conical [58], and reported to be varying among different species with a range of 70 to 195 nm [19,103,104]. The dragonfly wing structures are active against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria [105] and exhibit both antibacterial and antifouling properties [106]. Hydrothermal synthesis [107] and reactive ion etching [93] are fabrication techniques that can produce effective antibacterial surfaces with the dragonfly pattern.…”
Section: Insect-inspired Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%