2019
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2019102799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antigen cross‐presentation: proteasome location, location, location

Abstract: Our understanding of the mechanisms by which peptides from proteins present in phagosomes and endosomes are processed and presented on MHC class I molecules, in a pathway called cross‐presentation, is still incomplete. One of the main questions arising from currently proposed models is how do proteins in the phagosome lumen reach the proteasome in the cytoplasm to be processed properly. In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Sengupta et al (2019) present evidence for a surprising turn of events where, in fact, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Endogenous antigens and cross-presented exogenous antigens went through cytoplasmic ubiquitin–proteasome degradation, followed by MHC class I- and II-restricted presentation that eventually activated CD8+ and CD4+ T cells . The enhanced cell uptake and specific localization on the ER of antigen enhanced the activation of BMDCs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Endogenous antigens and cross-presented exogenous antigens went through cytoplasmic ubiquitin–proteasome degradation, followed by MHC class I- and II-restricted presentation that eventually activated CD8+ and CD4+ T cells . The enhanced cell uptake and specific localization on the ER of antigen enhanced the activation of BMDCs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endogenous antigens and cross-presented exogenous antigens went through cytoplasmic ubiquitin− proteasome degradation, followed by MHC class I-and IIrestricted presentation that eventually activated CD8+ and CD4+ T cells. 28 The enhanced cell uptake and specific localization on the ER of antigen enhanced the activation of BMDCs. As shown in Figures 3a,b and S3, OVA@LIPO exerted a weak promoting effect, while OVA-loaded targeting LIPO, especially OVA@PM-LIPO, significantly upregulated the expression of MHC-II and CD80 molecules.…”
Section: Pm-lipo-mediatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to about 60% of mouse specific peptides in the PDX models fitted the patients' HLA peptide binding motif ( supplemental Table S2 ). This could be because of overlap between the binding motifs of the patients and of the mice or may suggest that mouse peptides might have been loaded exogenously by cross presentation onto the HLA molecules of the human tumors grafted in mice ( 87 , 88 ). An interesting point is the similar distribution of the NetMHCpan ranks of the mouse-only peptides compared with the NetMHCpan ranks of the human HLA peptides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD8+ T cells can detect viral antigens presented through MHC class I molecules on infected cells or on DCs. The antigens can be endogenously from viral encoded proteins and are presented directly or they are derived exogenously from phagocytosed viral particles resulting in cross-presentation [130]. Detection of viral antigens by CD8+ T cells results in the destruction of the cell by induction of apoptosis [131].…”
Section: Sars-cov-2mentioning
confidence: 99%