Immunobiology of HLA 1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-3552-1_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antigen Society #14 Report (B40 CREG, BW60, BW61, BW41, BW48, B13)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, our finding of likely haplotypes possessing HLA-B*4101 and Cw*07 (i.e. not Cw*1701) suggests that the previous serological detection of HLA-B41 subdivisions [17][18][19][20] may have been caused by the unwitting use of HLA-Cw17 antisera rather than sera specific for one of the HLA-B*41 allelic products. This assertion is supported by the apparent lack of correlation between the serological subdivisions and those identified by 1D-IEF [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, our finding of likely haplotypes possessing HLA-B*4101 and Cw*07 (i.e. not Cw*1701) suggests that the previous serological detection of HLA-B41 subdivisions [17][18][19][20] may have been caused by the unwitting use of HLA-Cw17 antisera rather than sera specific for one of the HLA-B*41 allelic products. This assertion is supported by the apparent lack of correlation between the serological subdivisions and those identified by 1D-IEF [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Serological studies have suggested the existence of an HLA-B41 variant [17][18][19][20] and biochemical analysis, using one-dimensional isoelectric focusing (1D-IEF), showed two forms of HLA-B41 with differing isoelectric points [18,21]. However, the serologically defined and 1D-IEF subtypes did not appear to correlate [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) of B*4001 is unique compared to the other HLA-B40 group alleles. In contrast, no unique sequence was found in B*4002 (8), which possibly accounts for the absence of HLA-B61 specific antisera (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…were first described in an Indian population in Africa (2) and later found also in Caucasians and Japanese (3, 4). HLA-B60 can be clearly recognized with monospecific antisera and distinguished from HLA-B61 (9, while monospecific antisera for HLA-B61 have not been found thus far (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%