2007
DOI: 10.1089/pho.2007.2058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antiinfectives and Low-Level Light: A New Chapter in Photomedicine

Abstract: Low-level light (LLL) therapy is compatible with antiinfectives, and even capable of boosting effects of superficially applied and/or absorbed antiinfectives. Temporal coordination between light treatment and drug administration maximizes drug effects and minimizes possible adverse effects. Irradiation should start when the drug concentration has reached its maximum in the desired field of action. Light-induced flow in nanoscale cavities could represent one mechanism of LLL therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 It is based on the effect of visible light on the viscosity and density profile of interfacial water layers and confined water at room temperature, in particular, on the finding that exposure to moderately intense red light (670 nm) instantly increased the fluidity and decreased the density of interfacial water layers on hydrophilic surfaces. 11 Because of the hydrophilic nature of the total surface found in cells (macromolecules and organelles), most of the water confined in cells is necessarily interfacial water.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 It is based on the effect of visible light on the viscosity and density profile of interfacial water layers and confined water at room temperature, in particular, on the finding that exposure to moderately intense red light (670 nm) instantly increased the fluidity and decreased the density of interfacial water layers on hydrophilic surfaces. 11 Because of the hydrophilic nature of the total surface found in cells (macromolecules and organelles), most of the water confined in cells is necessarily interfacial water.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the results of our study where the irradiation with the two different doses (3 J at 0.25 W/10 Hz or 59 J at 1 W/10 Hz) resulted in a reduction in S. mutans and C. albicans amount in the same session can be explained by this above-mentioned phenomenon. The effect of laser on bacterial/fungal destruction was also described by Sommer where the expansion and contraction of the intracellular water volume and fluidity generate bidirectional flow [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of laser on bacterial/fungal destruction was also described by Sommer, where the expansion and contraction of the intracellular water volume and fluidity generate bidirectional flow 28) . This phenomenon likely accounts for our findings, where the irradiation with the two different doses (500 J and 700 J at 15 W/25 Hz) resulted in a reduction in S. aureus and P. aeruginosa amount.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%