1993
DOI: 10.1159/000474318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Urologic Surgery: Does It Give Some Benefit?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationale behind the effect of immunosuppression on wound infection and healing could be attributed to less inflammatory responses to microorganisms and to the lengthening of the healing process induced by steroids. 11,12 Beyond immunosuppression, renal transplant recipients may run a greater risk for developing SIIs, due to preexisting medical conditions such as diabetes mellitus (DM) and end-stage renal disease. The incision made in renal transplant recipients is assumed to be contaminated because the urinary bladder is opened to perform the ureterocystostomy anastomosis, and urine spillage after bladder opening could increase the risk of wound infections in patients undergoing kidney transplant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale behind the effect of immunosuppression on wound infection and healing could be attributed to less inflammatory responses to microorganisms and to the lengthening of the healing process induced by steroids. 11,12 Beyond immunosuppression, renal transplant recipients may run a greater risk for developing SIIs, due to preexisting medical conditions such as diabetes mellitus (DM) and end-stage renal disease. The incision made in renal transplant recipients is assumed to be contaminated because the urinary bladder is opened to perform the ureterocystostomy anastomosis, and urine spillage after bladder opening could increase the risk of wound infections in patients undergoing kidney transplant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the use of multidose prophylaxis, the emergence of antimicrobial agent-resistant bacteria related to the use of prophylactic ceftriaxone could be reason for concern. Data suggest that prolonged (Ͼ48-h) postoperative prophylaxis is responsible for modification of susceptibility to antimicrobial agents (7,8), but no deleterious effect caused by an appropriate short-course prophylactic regimen has been reported. Such data should preclude the use of multiple-dose antibiotic regimens, and a consistent effort should be made to use short-course or single-dose prophylaxis whenever possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In urologic surgery, a single dose of antibiotic for prophylaxis has been shown to offer at least the same advantages as multiple-dose therapy in terms of clinical efficacy. In addition, the single-dose therapy selected for both the resistant strains and the numerous microbial associations in lesser proportions (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%