2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2003.01616.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from impetigo patients between 1994 and 2000

Abstract: Clindamycin has shown excellent activity against most S. aureus isolates between 1994 and 2000. The incidence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus was always below 20%.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the frequency of S. aureus causing skin infection is more than CNS, 65.35% and 34.7%, respectively. This is in line with the previous findings of Nishijim et al (12) and Schmidt et al (13). In total, sixty out of 75 (80%) isolated Staphylococci were biofilm producers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In the present study, the frequency of S. aureus causing skin infection is more than CNS, 65.35% and 34.7%, respectively. This is in line with the previous findings of Nishijim et al (12) and Schmidt et al (13). In total, sixty out of 75 (80%) isolated Staphylococci were biofilm producers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Impetigo is a highly contagious infection of the superficial epidermis and is commonly caused by exfoliative toxins (ETs) of S. aureus [ 19 ]. The ratio of MRSA among S. aureus isolates from patients with impetigo between 1994 and 2000 was below 20% in Japan [ 20 ]. However, the ratio of MRSA has recently increased to 20 ~ 50% in Japan [ 21 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since gentamicin has been used generally in Japan for many years, it is commonly accepted that the use of antibiotics promotes bacterial substitution and leads to the appearance of drug‐resistant bacterial strains (24). It is likely that the frequent use of topical gentamicin has induced the appearance of bacterial strains resistant to gentamicin (24, 25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%