2009
DOI: 10.1155/2009/413749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Invasive and Lower Respiratory Tract Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, 1998 to 2007

Abstract: Previous surveys of antimicrobial resistance inStreptococcus pneumoniaehave found differences depending on source of isolate (eg, higher resistance in lower respiratory tract [LRT] versus invasive isolate) and age (higher resistance in children versus adults). Susceptibility profiles in the Calgary Health Region (approximately 1.25 million population) over a 10-year period were studied. Prospective laboratory-based population surveillance forS pneumoniaedisease has been conducted since 1998. Patient demographi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance with a previous report that respiratory tract isolates showed more resistance to penicillin, TMP-SMX, cefuroxime and erythromycin, than invasive isolates, and were more likely to be multidrug resistant. 28 The Canadian Bacterial Surveillance Network also reported higher rates of penicillin NS for non-sterile compared with sterile isolates (16.6% versus 12.4%, P=0.005), with respiratory tract specimens constituting 60% of the non-sterile isolates. 29 Similarly, in Quebec, noninvasive isolates demonstrated higher rates of resistance to macrolides, penicillin and cephalosporins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is in accordance with a previous report that respiratory tract isolates showed more resistance to penicillin, TMP-SMX, cefuroxime and erythromycin, than invasive isolates, and were more likely to be multidrug resistant. 28 The Canadian Bacterial Surveillance Network also reported higher rates of penicillin NS for non-sterile compared with sterile isolates (16.6% versus 12.4%, P=0.005), with respiratory tract specimens constituting 60% of the non-sterile isolates. 29 Similarly, in Quebec, noninvasive isolates demonstrated higher rates of resistance to macrolides, penicillin and cephalosporins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There are some studies in which the trends of Ceftriaxone susceptibility have been evaluated. In a ten-year study (1998 -2007) con-ducted in Calgary, Canada, 1.7% of 1170 pneumococcal isolates were resistant to Ceftriaxone (22). Despite low level of resistance in previous study, in a retrospective study in a university hospital in Taiwan (2000 -2007), 18.4% of non-meningeal and 34.9% of meningeal isolates (a total number of 3729 isolates) were not susceptible to Ceftriaxone (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…While there are less available data regarding the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria causing AOM, the penicillin susceptibility rate of S pneumoniae, which causes invasive disease, is >90% in most jurisdictions in Canada. (37)(38)(39) Because S pneumoniae is the predominant pathogen in AOM and because it also covers GAS, empirical amoxicillin remains the drug of first choice. M catarrhalis and some strains of H influenzae are more likely to be amoxicillinresistant (ie, are more likely to produce beta-lactamases) but they are less common pathogens, and AOM caused by either bacteria is more likely to resolve spontaneously.…”
Section: Both Choice and Dose Of Antimicrobial Are Importantmentioning
confidence: 99%