2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimüllerian hormone levels and antral follicle counts are not reduced compared with community controls in patients with rigorously defined unexplained infertility

Abstract: Currently utilized predictors of ovarian reserve do not discriminate women with rigorously defined unexplained infertility from healthy community-based women of similar demographic characteristics. Contrary to our hypothesis, among women with FSH in the normal range (≤12 IU/L), women with unexplained infertility did not show evidence of decreased ovarian reserve as measured by AMH and AFC. Ovarian reserve markers in isolation may not serve as predictors of future fertility.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, two recently published papers present noteworthy conclusions, showing that currently employed basal ORTs, AFC, and AMH do not discriminate women with infertility from healthy community-based women of similar demographic characteristics [29,30], in particular Greenwood et al who reported this conclusion based on a study which included women rigorously diagnosed with unexplained infertility [30]. The lead assumption in both papers stated that oocyte quantity predicts reproductive trajectory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, two recently published papers present noteworthy conclusions, showing that currently employed basal ORTs, AFC, and AMH do not discriminate women with infertility from healthy community-based women of similar demographic characteristics [29,30], in particular Greenwood et al who reported this conclusion based on a study which included women rigorously diagnosed with unexplained infertility [30]. The lead assumption in both papers stated that oocyte quantity predicts reproductive trajectory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68 In a recent multicenter cross-sectional study, no differences in serum AMH and antral follicle count (AFC) were found between healthy normo-ovulatory women with unexplained infertility and women not seeking treatment for fertility, even after controlling for personal confounders or study site. 69 Finally, other recent studies had already demonstrated that AFC and AMH levels did not differ between fertile and infertile women of the same age, 70,71 and that spontaneous pregnancy may occur even in women presenting low AMH or AFC levels, or high FSH levels. 72,73 In the light of the current knowledge, ovarian reserve tests cannot be parameters for inferences about the reproductive potential in the medium or long term.…”
Section: Tests For Measuring Fertility Among Noninfertile Womenmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Greenhood et al, 2018 [26] Case-control study comparing women with unexplained infertility and healthy ovulatory controls not seeking pregnancy 227 cases and 226 controls AMH and AFC AMH 5.9 ± 5.2 vs 5.2 ± 3.9 ng/ml (p = ns). AFC 21 ± 11 vs 17 ± 9 (p = ns)…”
Section: Streuli Et Al 2014 [23]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the quality of the oocytes rather than the quantity of the residual primordial follicles would determine the chances of motherhood. Even if an initial study suggested some relation between the amount of the residual ovarian reserve and natural fertility in women older than 35 years [21], five subsequent independent studies in the general population failed to show any association between ovarian reserve and natural fertility [22][23][24][25][26]. This evidence is summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Quality Of Oocytes and Ovarian Reservementioning
confidence: 99%