2017
DOI: 10.1097/bor.0000000000000410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antiphospholipid syndrome: an update for clinicians and scientists

Abstract: Purpose of review Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a leading acquired cause of thrombosis and pregnancy loss. Upon diagnosis (which is not made until at least one morbid event has occurred), anticoagulant medications are typically prescribed in an attempt to prevent future events. This approach is not uniformly effective and does not prevent associated autoimmune and inflammatory complications. The goal of this review is to update clinicians and scientists on mechanistic and clinically-relevant studies from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, one might ask whether A 2A receptor agonism would benefit other manifestations of APS beyond thrombosis such as pregnancy loss. While dipyridamole has a relatively robust safety record in pregnancy 49 , we would consider such discussions premature, especially given that obstetric APS may have very different pathophysiology from thrombotic APS 50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, one might ask whether A 2A receptor agonism would benefit other manifestations of APS beyond thrombosis such as pregnancy loss. While dipyridamole has a relatively robust safety record in pregnancy 49 , we would consider such discussions premature, especially given that obstetric APS may have very different pathophysiology from thrombotic APS 50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the clinical perspective, the heart valve disease was progressive despite anticoagulation [ 18 ]. Clinicians should be alert to the underlying SLE in patients with those non-criteria manifestations, for whom anticoagulants alone may offer insufficient protection [ 19 ] and for those with a severe condition immunosuppressive therapy besides anticoagulation may be necessary. Further search is needed to investigate whether non-criteria manifestations can predict future SLE in aPL-positive patients, while it is certain that non-criteria manifestations should be taken into account in the APS assessment [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the clinical perspective, the heart valve disease was progressive despite anticoagulation [18]. Clinicians should be alert to the underlying SLE in patients with those non-criteria manifestations, for whom anticoagulants alone may offer insu cient protection [19] and for those with a severe condition immunosuppressive therapy besides anticoagulation may be necessary. Further search is needed to investigate whether non-criteria manifestations can predict future SLE in aPL-positive patients, while it is certain that non-criteria manifestations should be taken into account in the APS assessment [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%