2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04151.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antiphospholipid syndrome: interpretation of laboratory data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It was reported that patients positive in all three assays included in the latest classification criteria (LA, aCL, aβ2GPI) have a better correlation with clinical symptoms of APS [19]. In agreement with the abovementioned studies, in our analyzed patients, RPL and VTs were associated with multiple positivity for aPL Abs and aanxA5 Abs of the IgM isotype (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It was reported that patients positive in all three assays included in the latest classification criteria (LA, aCL, aβ2GPI) have a better correlation with clinical symptoms of APS [19]. In agreement with the abovementioned studies, in our analyzed patients, RPL and VTs were associated with multiple positivity for aPL Abs and aanxA5 Abs of the IgM isotype (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…All positive assays were IgM assays. Taking recent debate of single positivity and the value of a positive IgM assay into account, one could doubt the clinical value of this APS diagnosis . Patient 6 was negative by all assays on Zenit, positive for aβ2GPI IgM with ELISA and Acustar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is important to note that confirmatory repeat testing is required 12 weeks from the original testing date [17 && ]. Triple test positivity (lupus anticoagulant positive, IgM/IgG aCL >40GPL, and IgM/IgG ab2-GPI >99th percentile) has been linked with higher rates of thrombotic events, which is useful for risk stratification in APS patients [2].…”
Section: Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%