1999
DOI: 10.1117/12.350832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antireflective coating optimization techniques for sub-0.2-μm geometries

Abstract: As 248nm DUV lithography is pushed to the O.18tm generation with logic features O.14tm and below, process control requirements become severe. Previously acceptable exposure latitude variations due to substrate reflectivity have become unacceptable. Additionally, next generation 248nm steppers with extremely narrow band laser illumination cause significant increases in substrate interference effects. These factors create stringent requirements for antireflective coating (ARC) optimization. We present results of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently it is difficult to achieve tight control over critical dimensions ͑CDs͒. 2 Implementing bottom antireflection coating ͑BARC͒ between the PR and the substrate can reduce CD variation by eliminating or minimizing the interface reflection. 3 Since reflectance at 193 nm is stronger than that at 248 nm, the antireflection layer ͑ARL͒ has to be used for gate and small size contact definitions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently it is difficult to achieve tight control over critical dimensions ͑CDs͒. 2 Implementing bottom antireflection coating ͑BARC͒ between the PR and the substrate can reduce CD variation by eliminating or minimizing the interface reflection. 3 Since reflectance at 193 nm is stronger than that at 248 nm, the antireflection layer ͑ARL͒ has to be used for gate and small size contact definitions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%