1979
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-42.2.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antiviral Effectiveness of Grape Juice

Abstract: Grape juice inactivated human enteroviruses, but not parainfluenza type 1 (Sendai) virus, in vitro. The effect was not one of aggregation or of degradation of the virus surface. Some of the inactivated virus adsorbed specifically to host cells, but did not infect them. Most of the inactivated virus could be reactivated by treatment with polyethylene glycol. Grape juice-inactivated virus and coproantibody-neutralized virus were both reactivated by contents of porcine stomach and duodenum, which suggests that in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inactivation observed was probably due to antiviral effects of substances in the fruit exudates. Similar effects have been noted [65][66][67][68] and attributed to plant polyphenols such as tannin; these effects have however been shown to be reversible [68] and may not provide protection against viral infection.…”
Section: Fruitsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The inactivation observed was probably due to antiviral effects of substances in the fruit exudates. Similar effects have been noted [65][66][67][68] and attributed to plant polyphenols such as tannin; these effects have however been shown to be reversible [68] and may not provide protection against viral infection.…”
Section: Fruitsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Poliovirus inactivated by grape juice had a diminished ability to attach to host cells; when treated with stomach or duodenal contents of pigs that had been fed a human-food diet, infectivity was restored, suggesting that if ingested, such virus would be fully infectious (Cliver and Kostenbader 1979). …”
Section: Capsid Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, virus that was present in the food sample may have been neutralized by coproantibody and, though still able to infect the intestines, has been prevented from infecting the cell culture into which it was inoculated (10). There are processes for clarifying food sample suspensions that also are capable of reactivating coproantibody-neutralized enteroviruses (25), but these are not as convenient as some of the clarification procedures that have been published recently.…”
Section: Negative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%