2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anxiety sensitivity moderates behavioral avoidance in anxious youth

Abstract: Individuals who are high in anxiety sensitivity (AS) are motivated to avoid sensations of anxiety. Consequently, AS is hypothesized to contribute to overall avoidance of any feared stimuli. No studies have yet examined whether fear of a stimulus is a stronger predictor of behavioral avoidance in individuals who are high in AS compared to individuals who are low in AS. We examined whether AS moderates the association between fear of spiders and behavioral avoidance of spider stimuli in 50 clinically anxious you… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possible limitation of this study is the exclusive use of spider images to investigate fear and avoidance behavior. We chose to focus on spider stimuli because of the high prevalence of fear of spiders, because spider stimuli have been most widely used to study avoidance, and because avoidance of spider stimuli has been shown to be significantly and strongly associated with global measures of anxiety [35, 36, 4345]. We are currently conducting research in our lab to examine the role of maternal acceptance using a broader set of stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible limitation of this study is the exclusive use of spider images to investigate fear and avoidance behavior. We chose to focus on spider stimuli because of the high prevalence of fear of spiders, because spider stimuli have been most widely used to study avoidance, and because avoidance of spider stimuli has been shown to be significantly and strongly associated with global measures of anxiety [35, 36, 4345]. We are currently conducting research in our lab to examine the role of maternal acceptance using a broader set of stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies focused on only two kinds of stimuli, spiders and emotional faces. Spiders were selected because fear of spiders has been the focus of other behavioral avoidance studies, is relatively straightforward to trigger, and has established rating-scales for children and adults (Kindt & Brosschot, 1999; Klein, Becker, & Rinck, 2011; Lebowitz, 2017; Lebowitz, Shic, Campbell, Basile, & Silverman, 2015; Lebowitz, Shic, Campbell, MacLeod, et al, 2015; Olatunji, Cisler, Meunier, Connolly, & Lohr, 2007; Renaud, Bouchard, & Proulx, 2002). The emotional faces were selected because they have been used in numerous previous anxiety studies as a more generic anxiety trigger.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expectancy model developed by Reiss (Reiss, 1991; Reiss & McNally, 1985) suggests that phobic avoidance is motivated in part by harm avoidance and in part by avoidance of internal sensations, a phenomenon termed anxiety sensitivity. Previous research using YIKES found that behavioral avoidance was best explained through the interaction of fear of the stimulus itself and the level of anxiety sensitivity (Lebowitz, Shic, Campbell, Basile, et al, 2015). Additional research is required to further elucidate the relations between behavioral and experiential avoidance and how to best integrate behavioral measures such as YIKES with measures of experiential avoidance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral avoidance research has been hampered in part by theoretical challenges (LeDoux, Moscarello, Sears, & Campese, 2017) involved in accurately measuring avoidance. Novel approaches to measuring avoidance using sophisticated technological advances hold promise for future research in this direction (Lebowitz, Shic, Campbell, Basile, & Silverman, 2015; Lebowitz, Shic, Campbell, MacLeod, & Silverman, 2015).…”
Section: Negative Valence Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%