2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aortic diameter is a poor predictor of aortic tissue failure metrics in patients with ascending aneurysms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Correlation with aortic diameter : Aortic diameter has been widely used as a clinical metric to assess aortic disease severity and progression [ 25 , 37 , 38 ]. However, numerous studies have demonstrated its poor predictive value [ 39 , 40 , 41 ]. Our results agree with such studies as we have observed no significant correlation between sinus diameter, distensibility, and aortic displacement (see Appendix A , Figure A2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlation with aortic diameter : Aortic diameter has been widely used as a clinical metric to assess aortic disease severity and progression [ 25 , 37 , 38 ]. However, numerous studies have demonstrated its poor predictive value [ 39 , 40 , 41 ]. Our results agree with such studies as we have observed no significant correlation between sinus diameter, distensibility, and aortic displacement (see Appendix A , Figure A2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current clinical guideline for informing surgical intervention is an aortic diameter exceeding 5cm. However, it has long been observed that diameter is a poor predictor of aortic failure in aneurysmal disease ( 10 , 11 ). For suitable alternative guidelines to be proposed, a better understanding of disease progression as a function of the genetic underpinnings of ATAAs is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure failure in the tissue center and not at the grips, samples are often cut into a dog-bone shape. Though not an accurate reflection of multi-axial in-vivo loading conditions, uniaxial testing offers a crude assessment of tissue rupture conditions [141,142,143], as well as 2.5. Aortic Biomechanics some insight into directional (intra-patient) and etiological differences across patient groups (inter-patient) [144,145,146].…”
Section: In-vitro Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in Chapter 3, despite knowing that hypertension is a risk factor for aneurysm, and the prevalence of hypertension in our patient cohort (≈50%), we could not ascertain the independent effects of elevated blood pressure on Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm (ATAA) mechanics. Alternative approaches to assessing statistical significance in studies of human aneurysmal mechanics have been to utilize linear mixed effect [159] or random forest regression models [183,143], though such approaches are not without their pitfalls [270]. We urge that in future extensions of the work of this dissertation, investigators employ more powerful and complex statistical tools, as well as draw from an even larger patient cohort, to reliably appreciate the individual contributions of specimen location, aortic geometry, and patient medical history on mechanics.…”
Section: Summary Of Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation