1991
DOI: 10.1016/0741-5214(91)90353-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aortic sepsis: Is there a role for in situ graft reconstruction?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Wide resection of the infected tissue followed by extra-anatomic bypass grafting has been proposed by some authors for infected abdominal aortic aneurysms. 7 However, according to a previous report 6 from our hospital in situ reconstruction was acceptable after aggressive debridement for a SAP infected by Salmonella. Moreover, in situ reconstruction with postoperative antibiotic therapy yielded a good outcome in the management of an abdominal aortic aneurysm infected by Campylobacter fetus, which is one of the known human pathogenic Campylobacter spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…6 Wide resection of the infected tissue followed by extra-anatomic bypass grafting has been proposed by some authors for infected abdominal aortic aneurysms. 7 However, according to a previous report 6 from our hospital in situ reconstruction was acceptable after aggressive debridement for a SAP infected by Salmonella. Moreover, in situ reconstruction with postoperative antibiotic therapy yielded a good outcome in the management of an abdominal aortic aneurysm infected by Campylobacter fetus, which is one of the known human pathogenic Campylobacter spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The simplest approach to reconstruction is in situ graft replacement, which is far from being generally accepted for the management of graft infection, but can avoid the potential risk of an aortic stump blowout. The results of a total excision of the infected graft and in situ reconstruction with prosthetic grafts in the previous reports 3,5,[7][8][9][10]14,[27][28][29][30][31][32] are as follows: perioperative mortality, 0%-100%; major amputation, 0%-11%; new graft infection, 0%-100%; new graft failure, 0%-14% (Table 3A). This technique may carry an increased risk of a newly implanted graft infection; therefore, it is only indicated for properly selected patients with minimal or localized contamination, or with graft infection caused by low virulence bacteria, such as Staphylococcus epidermidis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the principle of in situ repair even before control of infection is well established. [8][9][10] The pseudoaneurysm in our patient developed in the midportion of the ascending aorta and the aortic wall was not infected macroscopically at the time of repair. Therefore, patch angioplasty using Dacron material seemed reasonable, after which we expected that the preserved anterior wall of the aorta would grow and subsequent surgical intervention would not be required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%