2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aortic valve disease with ascending aortic aneurysm: Impact of concomitant root-sparing (supracoronary) aortic replacement in nonsyndromic patients

Abstract: The concomitant replacement of the aorta in root-sparing fashion is associated with an excellent operative outcome and adds no additional risk to aortic valve replacement in elective and non-high-risk patients. If the distal anastomosis is performed in an open fashion, while the operative mortality is still very low, morbidities are slightly higher, but midterm survival remains comparable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The root-sparing technique, used in all patients of the present cohort, replaces the ascending aorta superior to the level of the aortic valve suspension (sinotubular junction), and consequently, the coronary arteries (alternative terms: supracoronary or supracommissural), and leaves the native root tissue in situ. Sparing the root is the technically more simple approach compared with root replacement procedures (composite replacements, valvesparing, remodeling, and so forth) because of lack of coronary artery reimplantation, and results in excellent clinical outcomes [9,[19][20][21][22]. Leaving the root behind in ascending aortic replacements, both De Paulis and colleagues [23] and Park and associates [24] noted that neither a progressive dilation of nonreplaced sinuses nor an incidence of root reoperations is evident in aneurysm patients, in contrast to aortic dissection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The root-sparing technique, used in all patients of the present cohort, replaces the ascending aorta superior to the level of the aortic valve suspension (sinotubular junction), and consequently, the coronary arteries (alternative terms: supracoronary or supracommissural), and leaves the native root tissue in situ. Sparing the root is the technically more simple approach compared with root replacement procedures (composite replacements, valvesparing, remodeling, and so forth) because of lack of coronary artery reimplantation, and results in excellent clinical outcomes [9,[19][20][21][22]. Leaving the root behind in ascending aortic replacements, both De Paulis and colleagues [23] and Park and associates [24] noted that neither a progressive dilation of nonreplaced sinuses nor an incidence of root reoperations is evident in aneurysm patients, in contrast to aortic dissection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, separate AVR and supracoronary aortic replacements are safer procedures. Peterss and colleagues (17) reported no increase in operative risk after the addition of a root-sparing ascending aorta replacement compared with isolated AVR. Studies from the University of Virginia, University of Toronto, Northwestern University, and University of Udine focusing on bicuspid valves demonstrated similarly favorable results and confirmed the safety of the root-sparing approach (18)(19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Early clinical reports suggest that best results for aortic root replacement are provided with mechanical valves containing prosthetic conduits and reduce the likelihood of reoperation [11,12]. However, with increasing experience for reoperations and easier bioprosthesis, the use of biological valves has recently increased [13,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%