“…3 The effective orifice is larger and the transvalvular gradient is lower than prosthesis; the natural shape of the cardiac structure is little altered, and, moreover, the neovalve has better performance. 3,4,6,7 Wiggins et al described the follow-up of 58 patients who underwent the Ozaki procedure and reconstruction of an aortic leaflet. 8 The average age of the patients was 14.8 years; the velocity changed from 3.4 ± 1.2 m/s to 2.0 ± 0.4 m/s at 14.1 months; the absence of reoperation was >94% at 1 year, >85% at 2 years, and >79% at 3 years; and there were 6 late reinterventions (10%), of which 3 were for endocarditis.…”